|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dr. S,
Did I miss something? Why is it
necessary or desireable to take a discussion of Fibonacci to another
location? If we do this with Fibonacci, why not remove oscillators, pivot
points, Elliott, Gann, support and resistance, etc. When we get done
moving everything from this having to do with market anlysis we can swap cookie
recipes. Count me in favor of keeping all relevant disussions, regardless
of how overwhelmingly excellent they may be, on this list.
Cheers,
Norman
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
<A title=clayidus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:clayidus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>Dr.Sanjay P.Lulla
To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:48
AM
Subject: Re: Re[8]: [RT] Fibo
predictions
To, Ztrader
Count me in also for the off list discussion. I am a great
admirer of Joe DiNapoli and Neal Hughes and seen some of Neal Hughes fib
work,and I found it fascinating. Unfortunately,I have not seen z trader's
work,but I love to do so. I have applied Fib.in my trading and found it to be
extremely useful,but i am still a novice,who would love to enhanhce his
knowledge about Fib's
Thanking You, Sanjay Dr.Sanjay P.
Lulla,M.D.
<ztrader, <Count me in for off list discussion.
<Jim ----- Original Message ----- From:
"ztrader" <ztrader@xxxxxxxxx> To:
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002
10:23 PM Subject: Re[8]: [RT] Fibo predictions
> On Sunday, April 14, 2002, 9:21:00 PM, Neal Hughes wrote:
> > NH> It takes an open mind to study a
concept > > Agreed - unless we're boring the
list, it might be worthwhile > proceeding. It might be better
to take it off-list and continue > privately, since this topic
has already had complaints. It is, after > all, a quant
approach being discussed on an anti-quant list. :-) What > do
you think - take it off-list? - move it to a more quant-friendly
> list? > > NH> Fibonacci is a
key component of my trading and it helps me predict > NH>
probable turning points frequently and accurately. >
> I'm still interested in seeing if we can find the probability
of > 'probable turning points'. Perhaps if you could say what
you do > (without revealing more than you want to), it might
be possible to > convert that into a better analytical
scenario. We had a good start on > that in previous
conversations in which I was trying to convert to a > math
approach. > > A still-key analytical issue is
the independence of Fibs from other > factors. See my post
"Re[4]: [RT] Fibo predictions" for an attempt to > clarify the
question. We might be mixing apples and oranges, and > calling
the apples no good if they are alone. :-) What do you think re
> my previous post? > >
ztrader > > >
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|