[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[4]: [RT] Fibo predictions



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  ztrader 
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 1:34 
  PM
  Subject: Re[4]: [RT] Fibo 
  predictions
  
  On Thursday, April 11, 2002, 9:09:50 PM, Neal Hughes 
  wrote:>>(1) Fibs contribute a small but 'fixed' probability, but 
  the overall>>probability is improved by confluence with other 
  indicators, orNH> I'm saying that Confluence of Fibonacci levels 
  dramatically increasesNH> the likelihood that price will turn at that 
  level.>>(2) Fibs have a conditional (and variable) probability 
  that varies>>according to other 'market conditions'?NH> 
  Well, Fib support will more likely "hold" in a retracement of anNH> 
  up-trend, than it would if there were a strong down-trend.Actually, I 
  was asking a slightly different question. Imagine, if youwill, a graph of 
  probability vs time where the line is flat, thusindicating a constant 
  probability as a function of time. This is whatI was alluding to in (1) 
  above. In this case a certain Fib always hasthe same reliability, 
  independent of the 'market conditions'. A'signal' occurs when multiple 
  Fibs coincide in price. Several'smaller' probabilites occur 
  together.Then, imagine a graph in which the probability goes up and 
  down withtime - not a flat line, but a curve. This is case (2). In case 
  (2), Iwas asking if the ups and downs are caused by, or related to, 
  certain'market conditions'? For example, do the Fibs seem to work 
  better(higher probability) when the market is in a trend vs in 
  congestion?In this case a certain Fib can have a different reliability 
  atdifferent times.One reason this is important is that in case (1) 
  confluence is'necessary', but in case (2), it is not, and a single Fib can 
  beconsidered as independent. This affects how it is analyzed and how 
  itmight be used.NH> Confluence to me is a specific term defined 
  as an area whereNH> multiple Fib levels coincide.NH> I also 
  use other indicators to fine-tune and trigger the trade.NH> But not in 
  a way that I would call Confluence. For example,NH> Fibonacci would be 
  predicting (in advance of market action) aNH> possible turning point. I 
  wait for another indicator (MACD) toNH> prove that the market is 
  turning (lagging indicator, showing aNH> turn AFTER market 
  action).Are you thinking that confluence is associated with Fibs only? 
  Couldit be extended to any coincidence of indicators?
   
  As long as the indicators are 
  truely different (e.g., velocity vs acceleration, 
  etc.).ztrader------------------------ 
  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->Buy Stock for $4and 
  no minimums.FREE Money 2002.<A 
  href="http://us.click.yahoo.com/k6cvND/n97DAA/ySSFAA/zMEolB/TM";>http://us.click.yahoo.com/k6cvND/n97DAA/ySSFAA/zMEolB/TM---------------------------------------------------------------------~->To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<A 
  href="mailto:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Your 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
  






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


ADVERTISEMENT









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.