PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Think you should re read your mail
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
ric
ingram
To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 12:13
PM
Subject: [RT] Minor Feelings as
Obstacles
David,At Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:02:05
-0000, you wrote:"From: "David Jennings" <<A
href="mailto:davidjennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx">davidjennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Minor Pleasures as ObstaclesRic,I like to think that
I am in that happy little band which doesn't give a fig which way the market
goes, and have in general felt that yr. post have general merit and suspect
that I am one of the few readers left. However, in this case, I feel that your
last attack is both unwarranted and lacking in judgement at best. I am
beginning to believe that you have neither traded nor grown in experience.
"Thank you for expressing your feelings. I think
you have taken up the defence for Sue, thinking she has been subject to an
unwarranted attack.If this were true, there might be some sense in
your intention, if not in the vehemence of your approach.But if you
read the email again, you will find no such attack, merely the statement of
opinion about speculation on future price being an example of a common
situation - namely letting minor pleasures (in this case speculation on future
price) get in the way of making money.If you read the words, without a
fog of emotion, you will see that I specifically said "I respect your
individual right to gain pleasure in prediction...".If that is
consistent with your perception of an attack, then I plead
guilty.Perhaps, your reaction is another example of exercise of
emotions - this time getting in the way of your perceiving the content and
purpose of the email.You will no doubt find many others to agree with
your emotions and emotionally clouded interpretation.So you are doing
an excellent job of proving my point by the nature (as opposed to the content)
of your very reaction.Think before emoting. It is good for the
bottom line.Maybe your strong emotional reaction is trying to tell you
something about your own behaviour - if this were true, it would not be the
first time such a reflection was true.Good luck.May your
potential be realised, Ric.<A href="http://www.traderscalm.com/"
eudora="autourl">www.traderscalm.com To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|