|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I don't know if he uses "this Delta stuff"... but I do know
that
Norman Winski uses astro very successfully. And I admire
him greatly.
FWIW,
Brian Voiles
At 04:16 PM 2/21/2002, you wrote:
Charles,
Excellent observation. Your correct, at
one point in time, after spending an ungodly amount of money for the book
and a major block of time studying in an attempt to understand the Delta
thing I attempted to get some assistance from Wilder, got basically blown
off and put the book aside out of frustration. With the recent
posts I'm trying to keep an open mind about this methodology. I'm
skeptical when it comes to this astrological stuff to begin with so that
makes it even more difficult to keep an open mind. I'm still trying
but not getting a lot of help from forum members either so now I'm
beginning to wonder if anyone has gotten this Delta stuff to work.
I have a feeling that "Casual Correlation" is probably a very
appropriate term relative to Delta and if that is the case the book will
go back in the discard pile. I will not risk my trading capital on
"casual correlation". Based upon the responses I have
received relative to my request for assistance I think you know more than
your giving yourself credit for. :-).
Wishing you the best in all your future
endeavors,
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: charles meyer
To:
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] 118 calendar day cycle updated
Tom:
I do believe you've already reached your conclusion.<g> Have you thought of it this way?
A big problem with this delta stuff is that by the time you say inversions are possible and
that your accuracy is 1/3 days you will find that it looks like delta is predicting things when
it really is not. I do believe that's called 'casual coorelation'. But what do I know?
Chas
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Bowen
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] 118 calendar day cycle updated
The book does not explain inversion points or rotation very well. The end of my book indicates that you are on your own in attempting to define the correct cycles for each market. I have spent a great deal of time attempting to do this and have been unable to produce consistently reliable results. I would really appreciate anyone's assistance as the method looks to be sound if one can get it to work.
Wishing you the best in all your future endeavors,
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: SLAWEKP@xxxxxxx
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] 118 calendar day cycle updated
I have learned delta concept in 1994 when nobody believed in bull market
in Stocks. Mr. Wilder Delta originator was only bullish on the market then.
Problems are around inversion points, once rotation will establish rotation
will work.
The best way is to go back 118 cal days to see what was there & apply for
today or future as long as last set of swings confirms.
Points can invert so You have to consider it.
Dates are +/- 1to 3 days for error. strong markets will come before points,
weak markets can pass projected points
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Attachment:
Description: ""
Attachment:
Description: ""
|