|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Wrong. You do not have a calander spread, you have unlimited risk. to the
upside. The stock is the protection against the stock going to infinity. Look
at where you are with the stock at 100 and then tell me you have a time spread.
Ira.
MikeSuesserott@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Ben,
>
> your position is equivalent to a calendar spread
> buy 20 March 34 Puts
> sell 20 April 36 calls
>
> You'd get the same risk/reward characteristics without having to tie up
> capital in the purchase of the QQQ stock.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael Suesserott
>
> > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: profitok [mailto:profitok@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Gesendet: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 16:25
> > An: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Betreff: Re: Re[2]: [RT] Selling Covered Calls
> >
> >
> > maybe an example will make everyone happy
> >
> > buy 2000 qqq at 35
> > sell 20 April 36 calls at 2.4
> > buy 20 march 34 at .75
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "TheQuant" <thequant@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Daniel Goncharoff" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:53 PM
> > Subject: Re[2]: [RT] Selling Covered Calls
> >
> >
> > > Hello Daniel,
> > >
> > > Tuesday, February 19, 2002, 5:38:35 AM, you wrote:
> > >
> > > DG> When was selling covered calls (which is indeed similar to selling
> > > DG> puts) discussed?
> > >
> > > I went back and re-read his post you are correct. However I have
> > > trouble understanding the method. He sells calls, then understands
> > > the risk so he sells tons of puts. Did he also have tons of calls or
> > > a half a ton of calls. I think he has been lucky for 7 months?
> > > What's the exact method or is it seat of the pants? Besides that Ric
> > > brings up some very interesting points about the whole thing and read
> > > Tom Bowen's most recent post. Especially the part about the audited
> > > (independently)track record. If I only had a nickle for every bright
> > > star that has claimed to have made "Tons of Money" trading.
> > >
> > > DG> I thought Ben was talking about a strategy that was more like a
> > > DG> collar, if I understood it correctly. It seems to me that Ben's
> > > DG> strategy is based on differences between real price movements and
> > > DG> the pricing of options, which is usually done on the basis of
> > > DG> probabilistic models. Whether you believe it works or not, his
> > > DG> downside is limited, which makes it look a lot different than a
> > > DG> naked short put -- more like a bull put spread.
> > >
> > > Bunk his downside is limited!, the way the post reads he had more puts
> > > bought "Tons" then calls. Either way he could have lost on the trade,
> > > contrary his broker is smiling.
> > >
> > > DG> Regards
> > > DG> DanG
> > >
> > > What Ric writes below is an eye opener! He is absolutely correct!
> > > People can get crazy I tell you trying to avoid risk but rather
> > > causing self fulfilled prophecy of doom upon themselves!
> > >
> > > DG> ric ingram wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> But some people have a real perception problem - and do not know it.
> > > >>
> > > >> It is only reasonable to point out that given that you intend to hold
> > the
> > > >> underlying, selling a covered call actually reduces your
> > exposure to a
> > big
> > > >> fall. So if you were going to hold the underlying anyway, selling
> > covered
> > > >> calls can be considered a conservative strategy.
> > > >>
> > > >> However if you do not hold the underlying or do hold it but do not
> > intend
> > > >> to keep it, buying the underlying and selling a covered call is the
> > same as
> > > >> selling a naked put.
> > > >>
> > > >> Paradoxically, selling naked puts is actually lower risk than holding
> > the
> > > >> underlying if you allocate the same capital as you would
> > have done for
> > > >> holding the underlying.
> > > >>
> > > >> But rationality is rarely a bedfellow with fear or greed.
> > > >>
> > > >> Unconditionally yours, Ric.
> > > >> www.traderscalm.com
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > TheQuant mailto:thequant@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|