[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] RE: [gannsghost] Re: the 1128 on the S&P



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




no but 
the sq root of 1081=32.876+.62=33.496 squared = 1122 todays close and 

<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>                                                  
+.75=33.62              
= 1130 todays high 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>                                               
is 1147 the next stop then back to 1113 just speculation

  <FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: bondo92677 
  [mailto:bruce.larson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 
  4:46 PMTo: gannsghost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: 
  [gannsghost] Re: the 1128 on the S&PI don't know 
  about 1128 but 1130 is halfway from 944-1316.--- In 
  gannsghost@xxxx, "Neuro Fuzzy" <neurofuzz2002@xxxx> wrote:> itīs 
  a magic number . > > why so ? > > anybody to 
  explain me ?> > ;-)>   ----- Original Message 
  ----- >   From: jseaton357@xxxx >   To: 
  gannsghost@xxxx >   Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:30 
  PM>   Subject: [gannsghost] Conjunct Maddness> 
  > >   In a message dated 2/1/02 10:00:53 AM Eastern 
  Standard Time, gannsghost@xxxx writes:> > > 
  >     Now, several writers on both posts have 
  professed>     their beliefs that the bear no 
  longer prowls and that>     the bull has escaped 
  his pen. Maybe. To support their>     claims, Sept. 
  23 saw only the second conjunct since>     the Dow 
  top - geocentric Uranus to natal Pluto>     
  (individual revolution through self-transformation, 
  a>     double shot of karmic cleansing). If put 
  that way,>     yes, the bear could be dead. But, 
  Uranus/Pluto>     conjoined on 2/20/01, and nothing 
  happened. So again>     on 12/5/01, one day from a 
  minor top.> > > >   A trader friend of 
  mine was trying to use the 2/7-8 turn as trading and thought we'd rally 
  into that date just as early as Wed when I was telling him I expected mkt 
  to drop but just wasn't sure if it would begin Mon or Wed or when since I 
  have no great method of forecasting daily turns.  I've seen him use 
  these planetary cycles over and over again with not much success for 
  trading yet he still continues to believe in them as if they have worked 
  accurately over time which they haven't.  I tell him to write down 
  the dates but don't expect mkt to go into them like they are written in 
  stone b/c historically I write down his dates and they usually don't work 
  so they are good in retrospect and should be used as a tool (i.e., if 
  mkt is making a swing high/low into that date that is when you pay 
  attention to it but not weeks before, that's rediculous) but not major 
  emphasis.  I got your dates written down.  I have the Brad Cowen 
  set myself but have not read them as I feel my geometry background is too 
  weak.  I know enough math/geometry to forecast lows like 1081 Wed but 
  I am not complex like Brad and so I enrolled at a local community college 
  for a 1 credit geometry class this March.  I also just bought the 
  book Sacred Geometry by Robert Lawlor as was recommended on Brad's group. 
  >         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
  >               
  ADVERTISEMENT>              
  >        
  >        > 
  >   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:>   gannsghost-unsubscribe@xxxx> > > 
  >   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms 
  of Service.To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:gannsghost-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxYour use of 
  Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


ADVERTISEMENT









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.