[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Fun Stuff



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




If you look closely at the chart, you see that 
price did inch higher as the CV and breadth ratios dropped, thus creating the 
sell divergence Ben alluded to.  Problem is, I think he mixed techniques 
and projected into next week with another approach.
 
bobr
 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  BobR 
  
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:42 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [RT] Fun Stuff
  
  Its all psycho babble isn't it, entertainment 
  while we exist. Some like words, some like pictures, some like to relate the 
  words to the pictures with a mathmatical equation.  That's what its all 
  about along with adding a touch of feelings in the mix.  The concept of 
  using CV in a proportional relationship to price has been around for quite a 
  long time.  I was reading some old TASC issues dating back to their first 
  publications and the concept is there by a number of traders.
   
  bobr
   
  <BLOCKQUOTE 
  style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
    ric 
    ingram 
    To: <A 
    title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    
    Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:31 
    AM
    Subject: [RT] Fun Stuff
    Hi,Bobr.,This is just fun 
    stuff.From: BobR To: <A 
    href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Cc: <A 
    href="mailto:gannsghost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>gannsghost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; 
    Vincent DONOVAN ; Victor Wadel Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:05 PM 
    Subject: Re: [RT] nasdaq 100 /sellBen, the CV is back to where 
    it was on the close of 1/28 and open of 1/29 yet the ND is below its level 
    of the same days. The yellow Andrews Pitchfork is pointing at 1610. What is 
    your interpretation of the divergence between the CV and the ND as of 
    today's close? What would the CV have to do on Friday to convince you the ND 
    is going higher? How do you calculate the ND move in points with respect to 
    the CV move? The uvol/dvol ratio is getting rarified at 2.77 as is the 
    upissues/dwnissues at almost 2.0 These both seem to be saying there is 
    underlying strength in the Nasdaq. What I would expect in the next few days 
    is for the ND to work higher and the latter two ratios to diverge downward 
    from the ND. A very similar CV and breadth ratio situation exists with the 
    SP and the NYA data.bobrAre you talking about basket weaving 
    or integration of seismic activity with power rangers?Keep it up, I 
    enjoy it immensely.   Like listening in on a spy talking pigeon 
    English to another spy.Much amused, Ric.P.S.It must 
    have made some sense because I understood the answer! which 
    wasUnless we can close tomorrow above 1572.93 cash we are still 
    in a down trendTo unsubscribe from this group, 
    send an email 
    to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
    use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
    href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
    To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


ADVERTISEMENT









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.