|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Agree on the 1x1 positioning.
I don't use it that much anymore since everytime I seemed to find a good one
with enough points "hitting" it seemed to stop working for me :-)
don ewers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Morris" <LMorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 7:41 PM
Subject: RE: [RT] S&P Gann Box
> I remember that he was adamant about it also but sometimes he makes
> statements like this to keep the herd out of trouble. I do recall that the
> fixed had a built in safty net meaning if it "fit" the chart it would not
be
> to far off, where with the free form it had the potential to lead you off
> the path. It should be noted Don that when I use the fixed I adjust the
box
> to get a 1x1 near the current action.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Earl Adamy [mailto:eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 6:30 PM
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RT] S&P Gann Box
>
>
> I can't find the detailed notes I made from the tapes, however Andy was
> adamant in his use of the fixed rather than free form Gann Box.
Apparently,
> the fixed preserves Gann's price/time relationships.
>
> Earl
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Ewers" <dbewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 1:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] S&P Gann Box
>
>
> > Steve,
> > I still think there is a "proportioning" issue between the charts.
> >
> > It was covered on one of my old tapes (by Andy Bushak) but not really
> > qualified to comment on why it occurs, other than AGET apparently solved
> the
> > problemwhen we draw gann charts. Maybe someone more knowledgeable can
> > comment on the subject.
> >
> > Can you see the difference I am seeing? Basically Lenny's chart has
better
> > hits again (just food for thought anyway from what I see).
> > don ewers
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steve" <gts@xxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 1:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] S&P Gann Box
> >
> >
> > My Box is 1552.87 points - notice my origin is a 0 points.
> > A better method I have found is to use symmetry of a prior wave.
> > If you use the 12/94 low to the 3/00 high the box works better.
> > Steve
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Don Ewers
> > To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 1:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] S&P Gann Box
> >
> >
> > Lee, I like you use the "free form" gann feature (and place the major
> > action
> > along the 1 x 1) rather than the "fixed increment" version. Both by
the
> > way
> > "proportion" properly.
> >
> > Anyone else notice the difference between Lenny's gann box and price
> hits
> > and Steve"s box? The difference maybe the proportioning you mention?
> >
> > Take a look, I have attached both gif's. Steve, how do you address the
> > proportioning issue?
> > don ewers
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lee Morris" <LMorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:33 PM
> > Subject: RE: [RT] S&P Gann Box
> >
> >
> > > AGET has a feature that will automatically keep the box proportioned
> > > correctly. I know that this will bother the purest but it works
great
> to
> > > just click on the pivot and then by moving the mouse the program
will
> > > automatically adjust the box size, you then simply adjust it to fit
> the
> > > existing data points. This works verrrrry well. So to ans the
question
> I
> > do
> > > not pick a size I fit the size that fits well with the existing data
> > points.
> > > It is right when it looks right.
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: rosow@xxxxxxx [mailto:rosow@xxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 4:01 AM
> > > To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [RT] S&P Gann Box
> > >
> > >
> > > In a message dated 1/27/2002 12:09:08 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> > > mob88_88@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What is your logic for selecting 225(or 113)....no arguments of
a
> > purist
> > > nature from me btw, (seems to work well)..just curious on what basis
> > your
> > > selection of 225 (& 0.5*225) is made.
> > > Thanks
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Michael,
> > > I have just found that these #'s consistently work the best
for
> > me!
> > >
> > > Lenny
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ACHqaB/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|