|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Steve,
I still think there is a "proportioning" issue between the charts.
It was covered on one of my old tapes (by Andy Bushak) but not really
qualified to comment on why it occurs, other than AGET apparently solved the
problemwhen we draw gann charts. Maybe someone more knowledgeable can
comment on the subject.
Can you see the difference I am seeing? Basically Lenny's chart has better
hits again (just food for thought anyway from what I see).
don ewers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve" <gts@xxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] S&P Gann Box
My Box is 1552.87 points - notice my origin is a 0 points.
A better method I have found is to use symmetry of a prior wave.
If you use the 12/94 low to the 3/00 high the box works better.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: Don Ewers
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] S&P Gann Box
Lee, I like you use the "free form" gann feature (and place the major
action
along the 1 x 1) rather than the "fixed increment" version. Both by the
way
"proportion" properly.
Anyone else notice the difference between Lenny's gann box and price hits
and Steve"s box? The difference maybe the proportioning you mention?
Take a look, I have attached both gif's. Steve, how do you address the
proportioning issue?
don ewers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Morris" <LMorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:33 PM
Subject: RE: [RT] S&P Gann Box
> AGET has a feature that will automatically keep the box proportioned
> correctly. I know that this will bother the purest but it works great to
> just click on the pivot and then by moving the mouse the program will
> automatically adjust the box size, you then simply adjust it to fit the
> existing data points. This works verrrrry well. So to ans the question I
do
> not pick a size I fit the size that fits well with the existing data
points.
> It is right when it looks right.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rosow@xxxxxxx [mailto:rosow@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 4:01 AM
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RT] S&P Gann Box
>
>
> In a message dated 1/27/2002 12:09:08 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> mob88_88@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>
>
> What is your logic for selecting 225(or 113)....no arguments of a
purist
> nature from me btw, (seems to work well)..just curious on what basis
your
> selection of 225 (& 0.5*225) is made.
> Thanks
> Michael
>
>
>
> Michael,
> I have just found that these #'s consistently work the best for
me!
>
> Lenny
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ACHqaB/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|