[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RT] AREN'T THESE GREAT RESULTS?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




This 
is not a tradable system.  Problems are:
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
1. Way 
too many trades.  Commish say at Datek is $10 a round turn (are the # of 
trades you listed actual number of trades or Tradestation's misleading 
statistic?  You have to multiply by two to get actual figure in TS).  
I'll assume $10.20 (Datek's) a trade which gives you 1084 * 10.20 = 11,056.80 in 
commision alone.  Slippage pretty much eats up the rest (1085 trades * 
.0625/share * 1000 shares = $67,812.50).  Let's say for the sake of 
argument you're able to finess you entry and exists so that you get around 
slippage and say your actual slippgage is 25% of this value.  That still 
eats up your profit.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
Also 
trading so much increases your risk dramatically.  The more you trade, the 
more chance there is for mistakes.  They can and will happen (ie. on 
the pot when your system signals a trade.  :-).
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>2<FONT face=Arial 
color=#0000ff size=2>. JDSU is not a good day trading stock any more.  It's 
a bit late to jump on the JDSU daytrading bandwagon.  Last January and in 
99 JDSU was a GREAT daytrading stock but as it's lost value, it's lost 
volatility too.  No more multiple $2 to $5 swings a day.  You're lucky 
if you get one $.75 swing a day.  I miss it a lot.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
If you 
can cut down the number of trades to < 500 total without slippage then I 
would say you have the basis for a tradable system.  Remember when 
calculating slippage all you care about is beating Tradestation's entry/exit 
point. If you can do that consistently then you can ignore slippage.  This 
is important because there will be times when fills are a lot worse then what 
tradestation says you got and on occasion they will be better.   If 
you can exit at a better price then Tradestation then you can reduce 
slippage.  However, this will take some of the mechanical nature out 
of your system.  If you don't feel comfortable doing this then cinclude 
slippage which will require you to trade even less.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
There 
are better day trading stocks out there.  Try applying your system to say 
BRCM, SEBL, BRCD, YAHOO, or any tech stock above $15-20.00.  The higher the 
better becuase of volatility. There are also good NYSE stocks out there for 
daytrading.  Perhaps if you cut down on the number of trades and 
increase the number of shares you trade then the system becomes tradable.  
I'd say JDSU is liqiud enough to flip 5000 shares (the max at Datek for this 
price) which can reduce the effects of commish.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Brian.
<FONT 
face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2> 

  <FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: BL 
  [mailto:blee7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 3:08 
  PMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [RT] 
  AREN'T THESE GREAT RESULTS?What assumption was used 
  for slippage/commissions?----- Original Message -----From: 
  "popeallen" <popeallen@xxxxxxxxx>To: 
  <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 5:02 
  PMSubject: [RT] AREN'T THESE GREAT RESULTS?> I have 
  developed a completely objective mathematical trading> system for 
  trading JDSU ( also does well on host of other> nasdaq issues, with no 
  change in system).> Results: from 6/01/01 to 12/26/01 trading 1000 
  shares> Profits: $ 26,144> No of trades: 1084> No of 
  Winners: 715> Accuracy 65.96%> Drawdown(largest peak to trough 
  equity swing) $1084>> The system daytrades JDSU, all trades are 
  sell on limits,> buy on limits (sell strength, buy weakness), all order 
  entry prices> are calculated in advance of the trade.> All 
  orders were executed if prices went thru the order e.g.,> sell at 8.45, 
  if market trades at 8.46 execution was met.>> Is there a better 
  objective, mechanical system out there than this?> Anyone 
  interested?>> Pope>>> To unsubscribe from 
  this group, send an email to:> 
  realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>>To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


ADVERTISEMENT









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.