|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Don,
Right about ABC, or Big Wave A, couldn't agree with you more.
The idea for this being possible a 1 of 5 of Big 3, came from your post the
other day of
the Daily Get showing a possible 5 wave x 5 wave ABC wave, I was just
thowing out the bone of
possibility. What I hear on other lists is Thursday has alot of geometry
along with the bonds,
implying a intermediate CIT. But and I keep hearing the BUT.. its only a
probability and no
one is screaming this is the turn..
Certainly, some kind of turn is due when fractals present a multiple set of
interpretations.
Get in some ways is limited, in my opinion, because it can only devise a
count on three degrees.
I think there is 5 or 6 in theory. But who cares. GET is a really good
tool. You have really mastered
its interpretation..
Don
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Ewers" <dbewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] The Case for the Bulls
> Don,
> There are many possibilities (even an ABC or Big wave A?).
>
> One way to "qualify it" would be to do a 1.0, 1.618 (and 2.618 might as
> well) expansion (vertical height) to see where this "third wave" falls and
> to see if it has gone past the 1.0?
>
> If not to 1.0 (which visually it appears it is not) then it is a wave 3 or
C
> and not qualifiable yet, too early?
>
> If past 1.618 I would agree it is impulsive (not corrective) or a wave 3.
>
> Between the two, still in the questionable area for either? Keep in mind,
> wave 3's only end between 1.0 and 1.6 15% of the time (I use 1.6 so it
does
> not include 1.618) and 75% of the time wave 3's end between 1.618 and
2.618
> (greater than 2.618 8% of the time, les than 1.0 2% FYI).
>
> That is the analysis without using any thing else.
>
> Now is "add the 5/35 oscillator" to put a count to it (I am using
"localized
> count" from the low) another picture appears? A five wave structure with a
> wave 4 flat.
>
> So it can be a Big wave 1, or a Big wave A (wave A's have either a 3 wave
or
> 5 wave internal count). It is interesting to see the wave 5 target range
has
> been reached. Could be that correct many are looking for is setting up?
>
> So assigning counts without looking at the internal momentum of the move
can
> be dangerous and lead one potentially to the wrong conclusion if you are
> "just" visually counting?
>
> (Although your appears to be a tick chart , my 60min S&P cash looks
> similar).
> don ewers
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Thompson" <detomps@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 9:49 AM
> Subject: [RT] The Case for the Bulls
>
>
> > Here is my updated case for the Bulls.
> >
> > No one seems to have mentioned the possiblitiy that this top at on
> Thursday,
> > was the completion of
> > wave 1 of 5 of a huge Wave three.. This is what I was getting at
earlier
> > this week on my verbal post that was
> > garbled and unclear.
> >
> >
> > See attached gif.
> >
> > Don Thompson
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Stop Smoking Now
Nicotrol will help
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2vN8tD/_pSDAA/ySSFAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|