[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RT] Re: SingleStockFutures further delay



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

You don't know OI at the same time as volume.  It comes from the OCC and is
one day delayed because of the adjustments.  No on dollar value.

-----Original Message-----
From: BobR [mailto:bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:31 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RT] Re: SingleStockFutures further delay


Any chance ISE would include the OI in the daily summary?  Also it would be
helpful, maybe more helpful to see the daily total dollar value of calls and
of puts.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacobson, Alex" <AJacobson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:54 PM
Subject: RE: [RT] Re: SingleStockFutures further delay


> Yesterday it was calls 44071983  puts 25287341..... Our open interest is
> huge relative to our trading volume.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Norman Winski [mailto:nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:55 PM
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: SingleStockFutures further delay
>
>
> Bobr,
> No open interest data?
>
> N
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "BobR" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: SingleStockFutures further delay
>
>
> > Alex, attached is a snapshot of the ISE options trading summary for
10/16.
> > Do you have any comments about its usefulness for measuring market
> sentiment
> > in terms of a P/C ratio?
> >
> > thanks,
> > bobr
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jacobson, Alex" <AJacobson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:19 PM
> > Subject: RE: [RT] Re: SingleStockFutures further delay
> >
> >
> > > Yes and no.  No market has really established themselves as being a
> > serious
> > > contender in this product.  My view is the reason the industry isn't
> > rushing
> > > is the lack of success -- so far -- in the markets where they trade.
> The
> > > other issue is can a market really establish good price discovery when
> the
> > > primary market is not available.
> > >
> > > The current delay relates to have to bear the cost of the price
> reporting
> > > systems.  A new system has to be built and funded.  The way it works
is
> > that
> > > if one exchange will trade them .. they pay the whole development
cost.
> > > When exchange two comes in it pays exchange 1 back 50% of the cost and
> so
> > > on.  No exchange has yet raised their hand as exchange one .. ready to
> > go..
> > > and fund the project.
> > >
> > > They are a money loser for the exchanges that trade them now.
> > >
> > > Candidly I think the exchange decision makers have always had a wait
and
> > see
> > > attitude about them and any delay is "somewhat" welcome.  It has
nothing
> > to
> > > do with any regulatory roadblocks     .. the regulation stuff is
pretty
> > much
> > > done ....  it's just time to pull the trigger and write some big
checks
> > ...
> > > which will eventually get written.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: rmac@xxxxxxxx [mailto:rmac@xxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:11 PM
> > > To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [RT] Re: SingleStockFutures further delay
> > >
> > >
> > > Doesn't that put us further behind Europe. I would think that we
> > > would be giving up a considable amount of this business to them
> > > because of the delay?
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In realtraders@xxxx, "Jacobson, Alex" <AJacobson@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > SSF's have been put back until at least the end of March 2002.  If a
> > > > securities exchange doesn't start the tech work ASAP   ... and none
> > > have yet
> > > > raised their hand to start .... they will be put back till probably
> > > June at
> > > > the earliest.
> > > >
> > > > Alex Jacobson
> > > > Vice President Business Development
> > > > I S E
> > > > 212 897 8125
> > > > 212 425 4926 (FAX)
> > > > 877 7209918  (SKYPAGE)
> > > > ajacobson@xxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Protect your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption! Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE guide: "Securing Your Website for business" Get it Now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/M.WTOC/m1FDAA/cosFAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/