|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Mark: since you can't get into my head & you can't drop this... the sole
reason I brought up the small commuter plane crash in Alaska was the timing
of prior immediate posts talking about the AWAC that had crashed in
Alaska... Have you ever heard of making mention of a coincidence?
Everyone else has moved on back to market posts.... CAN YOU POST SOMETHING
USEFULL to the thread? Best, Dorothy :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: <mark_baze@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 6:12 AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Realtraders
> JW,
>
> With all respect, do you really consider a post about a small
> commuter plane crashing to be a "major event"? I call that fanning
> the flames in view of the prior postings to which I referred. And I
> don't like my magazines having advertising inserts falling out from
> between every other page.
>
> Mark
> --- In realtraders@xxxx, "Me Tarzan" <ibe98765@xxxx> wrote:
> > Sorry, Mark, I have also been a member since near the beginning
> > (using different email addresses) and I have to disagree with you.
> > External, indirect events do affect the markets and general
> > pyschology and I for one, believe it is useful to know about major
> > events. While your focus may be price action, others don't
> > necessarily follow your trading methods. Yes, many here are more
> > technical in focus, but TA doesn't provide all the answers. If it
> > did, we would all be successful and rich <g>, but I'd be willing to
> > bet that isn't true. The basic rul;e is that like a magazine, if
> > there is something you don't like, then skip over it <shrug>. Of
> > course, it would be a lot easier if we had a real web forum with
> > better software (where you could hide people you didn't want to see
> > posts from) rather than Yahoo's poor excuse for forum software.
> >
> > JW
> >
> >
> > --- In realtraders@xxxx, mark_baze@xxxx wrote:
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > Actually, I've been a member of this group since the beginning of
> > the
> > > year, I believe, and I have made at least a few posts in the
> past,
> > > although certainly not nearly the number you have (my e-mail
> > address
> > > can be searched on in the archives of Realtraders which are
> located
> > > at www.purebytes.com/cgi-local/swish/swish-cgi.pl).
> > >
> > > During that time I've carefully read each and every post to this
> > > list, including a good portion of the posts in the archives from
> > > years past, and I am very appreciative for the great majority of
> > what
> > > people have to say, with the exception of the series of posts I
> > felt
> > > compelled to finally write about. Since my bent is more
> mechanical
> > > system trading (and coding of the same), I'm not the prolific and
> > > capable chartist-analyst that so many of the people here are,
> with
> > > their often remarkable abilities to ascertain support and
> > resistance
> > > areas, turning points based on time and Elliott wave structure
> and
> > > the like, and so I usually don't feel like any contribution that
> I
> > > could make would be up to the level of the other posters, and
> would
> > > be more of a guess than anything else.
> > >
> > > (For example, I felt that there was a 50:50 chance that the
> > formation
> > > that completed yesterday in the broader market could have been
> > viewed
> > > as either a descending triangle with the potential to break to
> the
> > > downside, or as a bullish flag/pennant apparent on multiple
> > > timeframes with the potential to break to the upside; similarly,
> > > from a longer term point of view, I think there are about equal
> > odds
> > > of the market having now put in the final bottom already, based
> on
> > > the very strong "V-type" pattern that in other market time
> periods
> > > has successfully continued to move to the upside without a
> retest,
> > > versus the market having to in fact do a retest of the low made
> > after
> > > the attack and basically do a little more "shaking out." Not
> very
> > > useful, I'm afraid.)
> > >
> > > With the foregoing in mind, to a certain extent then I view this
> > > group as somewhat similar to a magazine to be read, as I'm sure
> > many
> > > others do as well - judging from the fact that there are 780
> > members
> > > in the list and obviously not all of them are posting. As such,
> I
> > > suppose I was making something akin to a "letter to the editor."
> > It
> > > is apparently your opinion that nothing Dorothy has done has been
> > out
> > > of line. I take a much different view, and I'm sure that there
> > must
> > > be at least some others who feel the same way . . . assuming that
> > not
> > > everyone is a chronically long-term bear, that is. :)
> > >
> > > Mark
> > > --- In realtraders@xxxx, "Michael Ferguson" <wl7bdn@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > Dorothy,
> > > >
> > > > I don't know where Mark came from, I have been on this list and
> > its
> > > > predecessors for several years and have never seen a post from
> > him
> > > til
> > > > today. It is pretty safe to ignore him. The REAL traders will
> > > certainly let
> > > > you know if you are REALly out of line. :-)
> > > >
> > > > Michael
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Protect your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption! Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE guide: "Securing Your Website for business" Get it Now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/M.WTOC/m1FDAA/cosFAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|