|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Are we sure the AWACs are going to Afghanistan? What would be the point of
sending an airborne air-control platform that is capable of controlling
500-1000 planes to a region that is currently being overflown by about a
dozen of our planes? Each of our aircraft carriers has some mini-AWACs
which have long loiter durations and are much better suited to the mission
and can be based on the carriers. Seems to me like Iraq would be a better
use of AWACs.
Kent
----- Original Message -----
From: "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Bull to Bear - Another Bush Appearance..... PPT at work
Not UN ... NATO which could have simply sent their AWACS to the Middle East.
I'd sure as hell prefer to have US Armed Forces protecting the "homeland"
than NATO! These are supposed to be our very best allies who would have come
to our defense had we been attacked by Russia ... they can't even patrol
over Afghanistan after we've shot the Afghan airforce and Air Defense to
hell. At least the Brits aren't afraid to fly with us ... I'd rather have
the Brits protecting the "homeland" than NATO.
Earl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Morris" <LMorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: [RT] Bull to Bear - Another Bush Appearance..... PPT at work
> the UN awax will relieve the US awax so that the US can send thier awax
> overseas. the US never planed to have to use 1/2 of thier awax overr the
us
> which is creating a shortage of AWAX overseas.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dorothy K. Carter [mailto:dorothy.carter@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:04 PM
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RT] Bull to Bear - Another Bush Appearance..... PPT at work
>
>
> MY guess is we've rec'd some serious threats to the homefront... so they
> have decided to get the AWAX here to patrol... I'm glad they are here.....
> remember one of USA AWAX planes crashed in Alaska about 2-3 yrs ago
when
> Canadian Geese were sucked into the turbine engines........
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 1:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Bull to Bear - Another Bush Appearance..... PPT at work
>
>
> > Ya gotta love NATO ... sending planes on the risky mission of patrolling
> US
> > airspace instead of the safe mission of patrolling Afghanistan!
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dorothy K. Carter" <dorothy.carter@xxxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:54 AM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] Bull to Bear - Another Bush Appearance..... PPT at
work
> >
> >
> > > Well there's Bush's 2nd appearance today and the mkt is not rallying
to
> > new
> > > highs... maybe time is up?... He's been the man for over a week...
> > everytime
> > > they marched him to the Rose Garden you'de been squeezed if you were
> > > short.. hee hee
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ralph Volpe" <rjv@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 1:46 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [RT] Bull to Bear
> > >
> > >
> > > > Earl, I agree with certain parts of your post but I question the
> pattern
> > > analysis. First, you are absolutely correct about the buyers not
> > > > allowing the sellers to overwhelm them. However, I think that's more
> of
> > a
> > > sublime seller technique to entice the bulls in, no different then
> > > > gently tugging the bait to get the fish to bite. As Dorothy argued
> > several
> > > days ago, if this is a bull reversal, then where's the volume. This
> > > > rally really lacks enthusiasm, especially after the sharp drops that
> > > occurred. You would think there'd be a lot more enthusiasm to bottom
> fish.
> > > >
> > > > As for the bull flag, I can argue it's a pennant, but that may be
more
> > > semantics or a trader's preference. If it's a pennant, then today is a
> > > > break, but I think this will fail and lead to prices below the
> > formation.
> > > If that happens, then my bull to bear conversion is on target, but we
> > > > have to see. Also, a flag or pennant is arguable and can be defined
as
> a
> > > forth wave correction in a five-wave corrective pattern that's
> > > > countering the WTC drop --- and today is the final fifth wave higher
> in
> > > that corrective pattern. If there isn't significant follow-through
> > > > after today , this move is doomed.
> > > >
> > > > Ralph
> > > >
> > > > Earl Adamy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > A bull flag should project at least 62% expansion of the first leg
> > from
> > > the
> > > > > retracement low or 1147+-. Like you, I am very dubious about this
> > market
> > > but
> > > > > if that's a bull flag, it's bullish especially in combination with
> the
> > > > > outside reversal and taking out of two inside days so far. The
> > critical
> > > part
> > > > > is what happens if/when it gets back to the high because it's not
a
> > bull
> > > > > flag without a significant move above 1087.50. The only
significance
> > of
> > > the
> > > > > retracement levels is to show that the retracement has been < 25%.
> > > > >
> > > > > My trading timing is suffering from 3+ weeks off so take it with a
> > grain
> > > of
> > > > > salt. One thing I have noticed most of the way up is that the
emini
> > > sellers
> > > > > (ask size) have tried repeatedly to overwhelm the buyers but the
> > buyers
> > > keep
> > > > > absorbing inventory and moving it up. The other thing which I
> noticed
> > > was
> > > > > the unusual configuration of the reversal out of the triangle
> > formation
> > > > > discussed here yesterday. From what I hear a) there were big
orders
> in
> > > the
> > > > > spoo pit this morning at the lows which drove the futures up
driving
> > the
> > > > > cash up in turn and b) the ESF (Exchange Stabilization Fund) is
> being
> > > used
> > > > > to <interfere with> <support> <manipulate> the market (take your
> > pick).
> > > > >
> > > > > Earl
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|