|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dave
I apologise in advance if the tone of this message sounds overly
personal, I am only taking your message (and others you have made) as an
example of an attitude that is becoming prevalent.
d graham wrote:
>
> (a) Its "hear, hear" not "here, here"
Well, you got that right.
> (b) Since this is directed to me I will be unsubscribing after this is
> posted - again, the best way to stop a headache is to stop banging ones head
> against a wall
It appears that you are only finding value from the list when you can
criticise something. I am a lurker who finds tremendous value in the
ideas being thrown out here. I am not paying for any of these ideas, so
I am not looking for brokerage statements or statistical proof. If I
want proof, I will research the ideas further myself. IMHO, many people
on this list want verifiable systems handed to them on a silver platter.
Many of the more rational and experienced members on this list try to
explain that that is just not going to happen, but it seems their
comments keep falling on deaf ears.
My point is that the value of the list is in getting the ideas (for
free). Criticising the senders only stops the ideas from coming, as does
bad language and any other forms of incivility.
> (c) My postings were not intended to belittle any particular contribution,
> just to point out the fallacy in relying on methods without any statistical
> proof. My decidedly tongue-in-cheek "W-days" were just as 'accurate' as
> anything I have seen you post
Well, no. There was at least one contribution made that you belittled
that had nothing to do with statistical proof. I know the poster was
correct from my 14 years experience that was directly pertinent to the
question at hand. I can't 'prove' to you he was right, but I know he
was.
A lot of vigilantes here are taking a nasty approach in questioning the
ideas of others. This nastiness is childish, and it keeps happening,
rather than being an isolated incident that can be forgotten.
> (d) those who spent 30k to learn the "secret" will I guess just keep trying
> to justify their "investment"
>
> dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <delta88343@xxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] SOYBEANS (Enough crap!)
>
> >
> > Here, Here.
> >
> > Norm is contributing with his posts.
> >
> > Those who belittle his contributions are not. Let them simply and
> > dispassionately post their opposing analysis in stead of critisizing his
> > methodology and reasoning.
> >
> > This kind of conduct certainly does more to destroy the integrity of the
> list
> > as opposed to someone simply cursing...which was inappropriate, but did
> not
> > warrent banishment in my opinion.
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.256 / Virus Database: 129 - Release Date: 5/31/2001
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|