|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
There are two groups that found him offensive. The first group finds his
"style" offensive.
The other group, and this is the most vocal group, is the group that Brown
constantly challenged to back up forecasting/trading/technique claims posted
to the list.
I use a lot of the stuff MB relentlessly trashes. Fine, I understand his
point of view and taken outside of my personal methodology I understand why
he trashes it.
He definitely made me THINK about what and why I was doing things and I
think I may have improved as a trader as a result.
I don't care if he thinks I'm a dumbass (or worse). My wife thinks it all
the time. Hurt me.
A little accountability has certain people all in a dither. Blowing away the
smoke and breaking the mirrors is bad form on this list.
Regards,
Tom Alexander
----- Original Message -----
From: Kent Rollins <kentr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules
> Is the cooling off period for Mark or his "victims"?
>
> Kent
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karl" <kschr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules
>
>
> Mark has contributed significantly to this group and, in my view, it is
> inappropriate to remove him. A short "cooling off period" as another
mamber
> has suggested is much more appropriate. I vote to bring him back.
> Karl
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|