PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Thanks for the feedback.
Re the price diff, I may have been a little over enthusiastic.
I forgot to add exchange fees when comparing the prices.
My current CQG bill is just over US$500 inc exchange fees.
On current exchange rates, it looks like my Aspen price
would be close to US$250 with exchange fees. (This could
be a special promotion price for Locals though - not sure
about that.)
So half rather than a third.
rgds
Peter
> X-Sender: joeduffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> X-Apparently-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 18 May 2001 13:07:54 -0000
> Received: (qmail 49855 invoked from network); 18 May 2001 13:07:54 -0000
> Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with
> QMQP; 18 May 2001 13:07:54 -0000
>
> I have used Aspen for an extended period with a satellite feed.
> The software
> is not that bad, and I don't think any worse than CQG for ease of use imo.
>
> I was surprised to hear you say it was 1/3 the cost of cqg over
> the net. CQG
> is 395 + exch fees over the net. Is Aspen (and I believe they use
> a comstock
> feed over the net) that much cheaper?
>
> Also I see FututresSource is making a fresh push with a new internet based
> product.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|