[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [RT] Re: Validity etc part 1



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hello Stig,

SO> That was the fun part and for the serious part.

just the opposite - the gifs i am referring to

SO> Connie Brown of Airodynamic Trading. Who is actually a great user of math, statistics, oscillators, etc etc has some great info on her webpage with regard to ratios. I also recommend her books of
SO> which I have read one (Technical analysis for the trading Professional - (which I am not)). Great stuff.

SO> I have included 4 gifs from her page. Check it out.

in gif #1 she has shown you that she has admitted variance of error.
this error would be akin to nasa shooting a rocket off a vertical
platform  whos degree of angle is exactly calculated such to reach the
furthest most planet in our solar system - all without correction.
right! like thats happening.

what and why all planetary calculations are insufficient to cast in
stone is that there is an amplitude that is dynamic. that amplitude
can be captured in time as a fixed measurement with some degree of
confidence - that in fact it is near correct at the time of the
sampling. but to suggest that fixed reading will be relative in the
future is just as typical as most market technicians not facing truth
and reality.

if you take cb's formulas and literally apply them to project the
positing of the planets i guarantee you her odds of hitting one would
be about the same as me winning a lottery that i do not play.

its  about the same as me saying i live somewhere in the south - point
your airplane and take off, never mind those side winds its just brown
noise.

-- 
Best regards,
 Research                            mailto:research@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/