[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: Correct Question



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Bryant, if we apply the question of what do I think of this 
type of analysis regarding timing using P/C ratios then I have to say that 
sometimes it works and others it misses.  The general notion is they are 
wrong in the trend and right at the reversals...sometimes.  The OEX P/C 
used to work until its options became more of an insurance item so the ratios 
did not reflect the public sentiment.  People like John Bollenger and Larry 
McMillan use the CBOE equity and equity + index ratios.  I stopped 
collecting data on the OEX options because the charts just did not appear 
useful.  Another ratio you might look into is called the Hines Ratio.  
That uses volume and open interest rather than just volume.  A third 
approach uses dollar value of OEX options rather than the actual volume 
numbers.  Bob Carver at Market clues updates it every 15 minutes.  
Borsellino at TradingMarkets.com and now has his own site initially had it but 
the time stamp and data were grossly wrong.  Don't know if its been 
corrected yet.  Tom Demark and son discuss a $P/$C modified with open 
interest in their book, "DayTrading Options".  You might be able to create 
it yourself in realtime depending on your data feed and software.  I've 
been doing it for a few weeks now with the DTN feed.  I take the four 
option exchanges and calculate the individual and total $Calls and $puts, make 
ratios for each and also for the totals.  The first few minutes of the day 
are rather noisy and then the ratios establish trend.  If a sharp change in 
the ratios occurs, then the index follows a bit later.  I am not 
convinced that end of day ratios are that useful since they can change so 
radically during the day, although BobCarver's numbers seem to work reasonably 
well.  When $C/$P<=0.5 a low is nearby.  When $C/$P>2 then a top 
is near. His ratio closed Friday at 0.68 and Thursday at 0.5.  That 
tick up might be a clue for Monday turning up from such an oversold level.  
 Finally, John Bollenger has recommended using a CBOE equity only put volume 
ratio.  It goes something like, a bottom is at hand within a few days when 
the put volume divided by its ten day average is >=2.  The sentiment 
indicated by the ratios is like an environmental condition and is best used with 
a price trend(bands or channels) and price oscillator combination to increase 
the odds of the trade.  The attached chart shows the predicament of using a 
form of sentiment as a timing tool for the OEX.  Sometimes its deadly and 
even leading.  Other times like now it is screaming buy me but the index 
keeps dropping.  That is telling you something.  When the indicators 
fail to work something bigger is at hand.  At the moment, there is no 
question in my mind that there is a gonzo move about to occur.  
Unfortunately emotions can get even more negative precipitating more selling and 
downward movement in the price channel.  If the OEX were cycling sideways, 
then the oscillator might be more applicable, but its cycling in a downward 
channel.  So the mode continues to be sell the rallies.  This is of 
course ignoring the recent improvement in the McClellan oscillator which by one 
measure of making trendline breaks has generated a buy in oversold 
conditions.
 
bobr
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  <A href="mailto:bulldog5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
  title=bulldog5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>B.Tharp 
  To: <A 
  href="mailto:bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; title=bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>BobR 
  
  Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 6:08 
  PM
  Subject: Correct Question
  
  Bob 
  I am sorry ,Though I did appreciate your response , It was not what I had 
  thought I sent you I was coping and pasting and some how I screwed up . If you 
  still wish to give me a response great , again the bottom gif is a blown up 
  picture of the top The charts are not current and were obtained at the NYC 
  online trader gathering last year . Oh well of mice and men again sorry for 
  the confusion .
  Bryant
  <IMG align=baseline alt="" border=0 hspace=0 
  <IMG align=baseline alt="" border=0 hspace=0 
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
    <A href="mailto:bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
    title=bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>BobR 
    To: <A 
    href="mailto:bulldog5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
    title=bulldog5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>B.Tharp 
    Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 4:01 
    PM
    Subject: Re: Question
    
    Oh, I have a long winded answer and will post 
    shortly.  It might surprise you that I take the question as a serious 
    one and not a trivolity of humor.
     
    bobr
     
    <BLOCKQUOTE 
    style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      <DIV 
      style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
      <A href="mailto:bulldog5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
      title=bulldog5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>B.Tharp 
      To: <A 
      href="mailto:bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; title=bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>BobR 
      
      Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 12:37 
      PM
      Subject: Question
      
      I don't know if you care to comment on this type of anylisis 
      
       ,but I wanted your insight . I came across this a while back . 
      I found it again and wondered if it held up in today's market . If this is 
      to much trouble fee free to take a pass . 
      It seems interesting . If you think it is worth the time of the 
      group feel free to post answer
      Thanks 
      Bryant Tharp

Attachment: Description: "CONE.gif"

Attachment: Description: " "

Attachment: Description: " "