|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Well yes, it just depends if the trader wants to view an oscillator or a
trend. The normalized will saturate and the unnormalized keeps running with
the trend. For me for daytrading I want to see the CV trend and go flat,
then I am thinking about a position change. Sometimes I use RSI of CV but
mostly use eyeball and brain neural net because sometimes CV leads and
sometimes price does if price is moving fast.
bobr
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dom Perrino" <domenick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: [RT] MKT - INDU
> Normalized volume can be used in any time frame and will give the same
> results as CMV except that it will enable one to compare day one with day
> nine or day nine with any other day without regard to the fact that one
day
> had very heavy volume and another had very light volume. Intra day you
would
> be able to compare 1015 to 1130. aside from the normalization aspect
which
> would be in percentages rather than actual total volume as in CMV , which
is
> one of my most reliable indicators, one should not get any different
results
> if you normalize CMV .Only difference is that nomalization gives empirical
> results..
> Dom
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "BobR" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 8:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] MKT - INDU
>
>
> > My short term intraday is to plot 3 minute bars of cumulative net volume
> so
> > using the normalized approach would give quite a different picture. Then
I
> > also look at it on an end of day basis. The attachment shows the
intraday
> > CV for the Nasdaq. Yesterday's chart had it for end of day.
> >
> > bobr
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <c_r@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 9:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] MKT - INDU
> >
> >
> > > BobR,
> > >
> > > What is your "short term"? intraday? or a few to several days? Are
you
> > > relating volume to price change or plotting the volume per cent as a
> > > separate line below the price chart? I try to track volume vs. price
> > > direction but haven't tried this particular approach.
> > >
> > > Charles Marchand
> > >
> > >
> > > At 08:20 PM 2/28/01 -0800, you wrote:
> > > >I tried that (U-D)/(U+D) once and it just didn't look good on the
short
> > term
> > > >basis. The feel I got was that comparing this period with a period
> years
> > > >ago and using the normalization made a lot of sense, but it just
seemed
> > to
> > > >cut the edge off the volume emphasis day to day. In the short run
the
> > total
> > > >volume and total issues don't change much. In the long run they do.
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|