PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
IMHO = In my honest opinion.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven W. Poser (crusoe)" <swp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
> IN MY HUMBLE OPINION
>
> ---
> Steven W. Poser, President
> Poser Global Market Strategies Inc.
> http://www.poserglobal.com
> swp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tel: 201-995-0845
> Fax: 201-995-0846
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JHP [mailto:jan4123@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 1:18 PM
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
>
>
> James,
>
> My partner and I have tried to figure out what IMHO stands for and we
> failed. Please explain it ASAP because our nerves are stretched to
> the limit -:).
>
> Thanks,
> Jan Philipp
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: James Taylor <jptaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 7:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
>
>
> > True, nobody knows. But I think a heck of a lot of giddy, dart-throwing
> > fools lost their shirts,
> > and retirement savings during this recent dive. The taxi-cab drivers
that
> > were offering stock picking advice now have decided that they do not
like
> to
> > trade stocks anymore. The line of lemmings to sign up for the next
run-up
> > will be much smaller, IMHO.
> > and the fear is in the survivors minds what can happen on the downside,
> and
> > that seed of fear will turn this upswing to dust before this year
ends --
> I
> > am watching for the next entry short.
> >
> > JT
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Carl Vanhaesendonck" <carl.vanhaesendonck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 2:02 AM
> > Subject: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
> >
> >
> > > James,
> > >
> > > I agree - I was not to say that a new bull market was in order. Just
> > > that IMO the bears would be taking a nap for a while. Nobody indeed
> > > can say whether this will be only a upside reaction in a bear market,
> > > or a new bull market.
> > >
> > > Carl
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx, "James Taylor" <jptaylor@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > I wouldn't go so far as to say a bull market is forming, far from
> > > it.
> > > >
> > > > The lemmings that got their lunch eaten by this last decline are
> > > wiped-out,
> > > > and it will take a hell of a long time for the next batch to amass
> > > enough
> > > > money
> > > > to form another bull market.
> > > >
> > > > We are at best, in a bear market up leg. I wouldn't get to excited
> > > about
> > > > it, unless you
> > > > are a bear and are waiting to pounce on the next inflection point.
> > > >
> > > > JT
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Carl Vanhaesendonck" <carl.vanhaesendonck@xxxx>
> > > > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 2:48 AM
> > > > Subject: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Just one comment, I made the following observation re Nasdaq and
> > > > > Volume:
> > > > > The last months were characterized by an inverted volume behavior
> > > > > (increase in volume when prices decreased, and decrease in volume
> > > > > when prices rised. From the 1st trading day this year, this has
> > > > > changed: the volume increased increased and decreased in synch
> > > with
> > > > > price, which would suggest a bull market is emerging.
> > > > >
> > > > > With most indicators, like MACD, there has been not one, not 2,
> > > but a
> > > > > triple bullish divergence, which is quite rare and also could
> > > > > indicate the down-up trend reversal has already started.
> > > > >
> > > > > We will see...
> > > > >
> > > > > Carl
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx, DH <catapult@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > For me the evidence is building that we have a significant
> > > bottom
> > > > > at least
> > > > > > > as good as fall 1999.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Further evidence, David Tice was a holiday guest host on CNBC
> > > today
> > > > > and
> > > > > > was answering questions from little old ladies in investment
> > > clubs
> > > > > about
> > > > > > how to short stocks. :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Dennis
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
|