|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
You've opened up a pissing contest that could go on forever and you know
it. You ignore the profitable announced trades and rant on about T .. what
you are really hot about is the fact that I don't believe that what has
happened in history, with a different type of investor, has any validity in
today's market except that people who need/use charts and technical
information often cause these things to happen themselves. .
If you're actually a trader, why haven't you been short these past 2 1/2
years? Seems to me that you're sitting in zero's and taking shots at
actual traders on a trading mail list. Even calling people you don't know,
a liar. If such behavior makes you happy with yourself, have at it. It's
your charactor that's on display. Any further shots will not be responded
to so feel free.
Bob
At 12:19 AM 1/6/01 -0600, you wrote:
>"I only began posting more at the request of several members"
>
>Sorry don't buy it BobKC and am always suspicious of someone who states that
>kind of calling?
>
>You were/have been/are bragging and yes you have had some very bad calls . .
>. on the record.
>
>All any one on this list would ask is stop the "in the face stuff" about
>reading charts, technical things whatever . . . . with such a record as
>yours, you are no better bottom line and "your fundamentals have sucked" big
>time during this time period. I have had a "majority" of my investments in
>cash for a long time, I admit that, right or wrong but it does not mean I
>have not been active in the markets on a short term basis and profitable, as
>may have been you. All can say is that, you were a bull and very wrong at
>"risky times in my book" but shamed people for not being so and now you are
>a bear and seem to be now proud f it. If you called the Fed move earlier
>great, but obvious to allot of us that things were falling apart and
>something needed to be done. I moved out of stocks when the valuations
>seemed unreasonable and risky to me personally, maybe too early but now it
>appears that was not all that bad of a decision, since I am on a great deal
>of my investments 2 1/2 years into some Zero's that look pretty good right
>now, 4 1/2 to go and I have a double, with no risk, smart . . . uhhhh
>maybe, safe . . . yep . . . .after my 30+ years of investing also.
>
>Seems to me the fundamental approach has a ways to go too after all, but
>then again buying T at those multiples and with their weak antiquated story
>and technology was not, one must admit, fundamentals . . more like getting
>caught up in a mania?
>don ewers
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "BobsKC" <bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 9:48 PM
>Subject: Re: [RT] NAS
>
>
>> Damn.. I hate it when someone pastes posts from months ago, insults me and
>> does so with zero knowledge of when I got out of trades or at what price I
>> entered them. Yes, I've lost money in T and I lost three points in ZIPL.
>> I broke even in WCG and made 4.5 points in LOW .. I'm net 14 points to the
>> good in EPG over four trades and net 6 to the good in RIG. I've got 3.5+
>> points in RRC on 14K shares and I believe that is all that were mentioned
>> in the pasted mails. I never mention day trades and due to my thin
>> posting record, even most position trades have never been
>> reported/mentioned, here.
>>
>> I stated that the chart folks would create a self fullfilling prophecy
>> which it is certainly fair to say they did and I suggested a rate decrease
>> was coming before it was in vogue to believe that. I mentioned 1/2 point
>> this month and warned of becoming confident after we got it.
>>
>> You skipped my second to last post where I talked about being in the
>energy
>> stocks which in my last post, I gave a report on how they did today.
>Taken
>> on its own, without the mail stating my positions, I suppose the last one
>> could have sounded like bragging ... oh well.. I only began posting more
>at
>> the request of several members who seemed to think my 30+ years as a
>trader
>> might yield some valuable information for them but since you don't see
>it
>> that way, I'll go back to my norm of seldom posting.
>>
>> I'm not sure what has irritated you so with my post today Don but I doubt
>> it is because you had a bad day in the markets since you've been in cash
>> for the past 2 1/2 years. If you wish to take this further, please keep
>> it off the mail list and just post to me directly. I doubt the list
>> members are interested.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>> At 07:08 PM 1/5/01 -0600, you wrote:
>> >
>> >BobKC
>> >This is interesting that you make this type of post now. . what follows
>> >are all your other ones starting from 9-7-00 . . . not a track record one
>> >would want to brag about . . . your favorite T sure did good . . . (sorry
>> >group but this is a long one, but follow the thread) . . . . .so not
>sure
>> >where you are coming from . . . but you may be a contrary indicator at
>times
>> >. . . that said glad you don't manage my money which admittedly has been
>in
>> >cash way to early in July 1998 so missed allot but then I am willing to
>> >admit that . . . point being you come off as knowing everything . . .
>well
>> >guess not, at least from 9-7-00 . . . read and . . .
>> >I expect flack from this post but really . . . .
>> >don ewers
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
|