[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Re: While the judges decide...on track



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Prosper,

Thanks for your interesting correlation with the Gore ve Stocks and Bonds vs
Bush.

I am new to the post and new to the markets as well. From your post Do I
infer that Gore victory would push Stocks up and Bonds down, and Gore
victory would push Bonds up and Stocks down. That would be a short / medium
term out look. Long term they sort of go together?

Can you please elaborate please

Cheers
Ashok
----- Original Message -----
From: Prosper <brente@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 1:02 PM
Subject: [RT] Re: While the judges decide...on track


> Tony if you will notice, every post I post is about trading.
> Including this one.
>
> I personally invite reasonable and informed points of view like
> yours. I am pleased that we enjoy the freedom to post our point of
> views here.  At the present time most analysts would agree that the
> US election is effecting the markets. So a post about it is on topic.
> I have heard that the bonds are pro Bush and stocks pro Gore. The
> bounce in bonds today seems not to agree with that, but perhaps I
> just don't understand the subtleties. Many things effect the markets
> politics is just one of them. For example, if it weren't for the
> invention and development of the PC I doubt we would have any bull
> now.
>
> I have no hatred for Canada, England, or any other Country. I
> wouldn't want manipulation or corruption of Canada's election process
> any more that I would want it here. I know that there is no such
> thing as a fault free election. That's why there are laws governing
> the elections and that's the reason that machines are used. They
> don't care who wins. Two machine counts were done and Bush won both.
> The laws of Florida had been followed, up until this recent turn of
> events. The justices could have affirmed the laws on the books and
> put an end to this. To allow interpretation and manipulation by
> biased parties would destroy the election process in any country.
>
> BTW I trade the Canadian Dollar and right now we are getting a short
> term bounce and it could rally to at least .6550 if it covers 2
> recent gaps.
>
> Prosper
>
>
> > Anyhow, we're all entitled to our opinions.  But the message I
> wanted to send before I digressed was "can't we get this forum back
> on track"?
> >
> > Tony
> >
>
> >     -----Original Message-----
> >     From: Tony Pylypuk [mailto:tpylypuk@x...]
> >     Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 5:29 PM
> >     To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >     Subject: Re: [RT] Re: While the judges decide...
> >
> >
> >     Regarding the thread entitled 'while the judges decide'.
> >
> >     First, aren't the passions really off-topic?
> >
> >     Second, I can't resist either.
> >
> >     For the most part even from Canada I mostly understand the
> passion for
> >     'meat, guns, dams, electricity, oil, gas, chain saws,
> ownership, kids,
> >     Christians, whites and paychecks'.
> >
> >     What I don't understand is the logic that democrats are bad for
> free
> >     enterprise or the American way of life.
> >
> >     In November '92 y'all in those United States of America elected
> a democrat.
> >
> >     As of 12/31/92 INDU was at 3,301, NASDAQ was at 776.
> >
> >     Today INDU is at 10,399 and NASDAQ is at 2,755.
> >
> >     I make the increases between 12/31/92 and now to be 215% and
> 255%,
> >     respectively.
> >
> >     So why if the markets are a leading indicator, are democrats so
> bad for the
> >     market?
> >
> >     If on the other hand, one subscribes to the theory that the
> market does what
> >     it does in its own time and that the coincidence of the
> prosperity of the
> >     last 8 years and the democratic presidency is just that - a
> coincidence -
> >     then since we are now in a bear market, wouldn't it be prudent
> to have the
> >     democrats in power so that Keynesian economics (i.e., spend
> more in times of
> >     want from taxes taken in times of plenty) may be employed to
> cushion the
> >     social and economic effects of a recession rather than giving
> the wealth to
> >     that segment of society which can best weather the storm and
> letting the
> >     rest of America be damned.
> >
> >     Anyhow can we get back to the purpose of this forum?
> >
> >     Please and thanks.
> >
> >     Tony
> >
> >     P.S. Canada's murder rate is about 1/10th of America's.
> Firearms are
> >     controlled and handguns are largely prohibited.  But we don't
> want to go
> >     there on the RealTraders forum.
> >
> >     Regards.
> >
> >     P.P.S. I have read the decision of the Florida Supreme Court.
> It is
> >     cogently and convincingly reasoned.  I anticipate that the U.S.
> Supreme
> >     Court will concur, unless it too is politicized.
> >
> >     ----- Original Message -----
> >     From: "Prosper " <brente@xxxx>
> >     To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Sent: November 22, 2000 9:36 AM
> >     Subject: [RT] Re: While the judges decide...
> >
> >
> >     > >From here it looks like a shoulder is getting broken this
> morning in
> >     > the Bonds. It's holding the channel like water in a pipe. I
> was so
> >     > ticked at the judges I had to take a xanax to go to sleep.
> It's
> >     > utterly incomprehensilbe to me how they could throw the door
> open so
> >     > that every election from here on will be a sham. If ones vote
> means
> >     > nothing you've no representation, no freedom. A truly sad day
> from
> >     > here in the States. Well, they say it has to get worse before
> it gets
> >     > better. Lets see now, if the demos get all they want we get
> no meat,
> >     > no guns, no dams electricity oil or gas, no chain saws, no
> ownership,
> >     > no kids, no Christians, no whites, no paycheck(it goes to the
> >     > goverment). Sounds like paradise.
> >     >
> >     > Prosper
> >     > Oh I almost forgot, they want this paradise for the whole
> world:)
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > --- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx, "t-bondtrader" <t-
> bondtrader@xxxx>
> >     > wrote:
> >     > > Stig
> >     > >
> >     > > While the judges are deciding and the Americans have their
> sweet
> >     > dreams or nightmares, I thought you might like to view the
> attached
> >     > and see if you agree that the picture you are looking at
> reflects
> >     > what the reality might be....
> >     > >
> >     > > What do you think>
> >     > >
> >     > > Bill Eykyn
> >     > > PS I missed marking the continuation DS on the bonds...
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >     > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>


-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/0/_/152424/_/974948704/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx