[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Forecast Review



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


>One of the reasons I do not follow the fib %'s 
is that when you take into account all the >levels of %'s, the price action 
is bound to turn on or near one of the %'s.  its still a >guessing game 
when it come right down to it.  
 
That is a very key and telling 
statement!   The market retraces usually to certain levels and, more 
often than not, spot on or pretty close to a Fibonacci level.  That is a 
fact.  Which one, is always the question, is it not?!!
 
The answer lies in the price action, movement and 
pattern as the market approaches, and, through one or another of these facets, 
shows you what it is going to do.  You are not always in tune with the 
market and it is not possible for you to be so.  Because of this, you have 
to have a money management scheme which allows you to be wrong more often than 
you are right - and still come out on top.  It is as simple or as difficult 
as that...  and once again, it is sometimes simple and at other times 
difficult, but you can trade the concept and you can make money, once you know 
what you are doing, when the market is doing what it is doing...
 
Fun, ain't it?
 
 
And, for the hell of it, I am attaching that gif 
again and hoping...  it is only 17.9KB
 
 
Bill Eykyn<A 
href="mailto:t-bondtrader@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>t-bondtrader@xxxxxxxxxxxx<A 
href="http://www.t-bondtrader.com";>www.t-bondtrader.com"Learn to read 
the tape"
 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  Merkley, Steve 
  
  To: <A 
  href="mailto:'realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx'" 
  title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>'realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx' 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 8:01 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [RT] Forecast Review
  
  Norman, 
  When you state that "both lows coincided with a 
  planet turning either retrograde or direct", it sounds like the same 
  problem.  I really don't want to sound negative because I have not 
  studied astro trading,  and I believe that you are a successful trader, 
  but it seems that almost every other day a planet will go retrograde or direct 
  and it now starts looking a lot like the fib %'s.  Which planet going 
  retrograde or direct is going to be the one that turns the market and in hind 
  sight the price action is bound to turn on one of those events, but which one, 
  it is still a guessing game when you come right down to 
  it.     So give me your address so I can send you $30 and 
  lets start to study this out and prove my negative theory wrong.  
  Thanks
  Steve merkley 
  
    -----Original 
    Message----- From:   
    Norman [SMTP:nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>Sent:   Wednesday, 
    November 01, 2000 1:44 AM <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>To:     <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>Subject:        <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>[RT] Forecast Review 
    RT, 
      I hope no one  minds my reposting 
    this information.  Some times much can <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>be learned with the benefit of hindsight. Please note that the 
    S&P 500 cash made its low at 1306 on 
    October 18 and there was a retest of the lows on <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>October 26. Both lows coincided with a planet turning either 
    Retrograde or Direct.  Now in 
    hindsight, we can see the signficance of these points. 
    Please see previous post and chart below. 
    
    Retrospectively, 
    Norman 
    ----- Original Message ----- <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>From: "Norman" <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
    To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
    Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 7:08 PM 
    Subject: Re: [RT] Software - Pattern 
    Smasher 
    > > 
    ----- Original Message ----- > From: 
    "Phil" <rhodes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > 
    To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx> > 
    Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 8:37 PM <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> Subject: Re: [RT] Software - Pattern Smasher <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > 
    > > <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > > >   
    Maybe you are one of the few that is correct 100% of the time.  If 
    you > > are not one of the richest 
    men in the US. then maybe it is just an <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> illusion? > 
    > NW:  No where did I say that I was one 
    of the richest or that I was right > 
    100% of the time. > Why must this 
    approach be 100% accurate or its invalid?  No other market 
    > approach is put to that standard.  
    Most traders would be thrilled to find <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> something that offers them a marginal edge 60% of the time. I 
    think this > approach has the 
    potential to signficantly exceed that expectation. <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > 
    Cheers, > <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> Norman > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > 
    > > 
    "Phil" <rhodes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > 
    > >To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx> <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 2:40 PM <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >Subject: Re: [RT] Software - Pattern 
    Smasher > > > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >  "I knew 8 years ago that  
    turning points could not be known ahead of <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> time > > >and I 
    still know it.  If > > 
    >> they could, some traders would almost never have a losing 
    trade" > > > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > > > 
    > >Phil, > > > 
    > > >   Check your 
    ephemeris.  Mercury turned Retrograde Oct. 18, 2000, 9:41 
    > AM > 
    > >ET, at 15-45 Scorpio which equals 225-45 degrees on the 
    Zodiac.  3 cycles <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> of > > 
    >360 degrees is 1080 degrees. Add 225-45 + 1080 = 1305-45 or in 
    decimal > form <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >1305.75. What was the time and price of the 
    low for the cash S&P 500 on > > 
    >October 18, the most recent swing low? <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > > > > 
    >  Still skeptical? Of course!  Say that was hindsight?  
    Ok, Uranus will > turn 
    > > >Direct at 16deg.54min. Aquarius or 
    316-54 on the Zodiac on October 26, > 
    2000, > > >at 11:23 AM. Uranus 
    rules electronics, > > 
    >computers, broadcasting, etc. Look for a key change in trend for 
    the > market <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >led by those market sectors at that time. 
    Primary harmonic for the S&P > 
    will > > >be 1396. Other major 
    harmonics for that time are:  Outer planet (i.e. <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto) 
    Directs and Retrogrades usually 
    > > >generate a change in trend for the 
    market within one day of the <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>planetary > > 
    >event. > > > 
    > > >180 = 1216 <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >120 = 1276 <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > > 90 =  1306 <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > > 60 =  1336 <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > > 60 =  1456 <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > > 90 =  1486 <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >120 = 1516 > > 
    >180 = 1576 > > > 
    > > >  Please note that the Uranus 
    Direct is less than one degree of being a <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >square (90 degrees) to Mercury Retrograde at 15-45 
    Scorpio  thereby > > 
    >reinforcing the harmonics generated by the previous planetary 
    retrograde. <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >Let's see if there is anything to this or perhaps the 
    past 30 years of my <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >research has been an "illusion" Conversely, 
    if it looks as it has merit, 
    > are > 
    > >you willing to follow the "yellow brick road"? <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > > > 
    > > > > >Good 
    Trading, > > > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >Norman Winski <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > > > > 
    > > > > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >. > 
    > >What was the l > > 
    > > > > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > > > 
    > > > > > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > > > 
    > >----- Original Message ----- <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >From: "Phil" <rhodes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
    > > >To: 
    <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > 
    >Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 2:40 PM <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >Subject: Re: [RT] Software - Pattern Smasher 
    > > > <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > > > > 
    >> > > >> 
    > > >>   Better be 
    carefull of what you wish for.   Seems "Omega" may be 
    doing > 
    > >the > > >> same 
    thing.  Have a product then offer a new product and not support 
    > the > 
    > >> older product.  It seems they may even go to internet 
    only and not > support 
    > > >> the stand alone stuff in the 
    near future?  Lets hope not.  That giant <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> step > > 
    >> forward seems to cost the ones (little guys) who are paying for it 
    a > lot. <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >> Of course the companies sell the new stuff for 
    more money. > > 
    >>   Also read in an earlier post that it now looks like NP 
    was sold as an <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >> illusion?  The maker of the 
    software seems to have said that looking <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> back > > >> it 
    was just an illusion as far as trading turning points.  I say 
    stay > away <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >> from illusions.  Even if you think 
    they work. > > >>   
    I just don't like that kind of giant steps, especially if I am 
    paying > 
    > >for > > >> those 
    giant steps, after I paid for the baby steps in the first <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>place. > I 
    > > >> also wouldn't be to fond of 
    paying for something that is now being <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> called > > >> an 
    illusion that doesn't work. > > 
    >>   Enough of this stuff. Not all, but most of the stuff 
    sold is junk, > and <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >we > 
    > >> just have to live with it.  Buyer beware.  And don't 
    expect a refund > even 
    > > >> if the stuff have been shown 
    to be an illusion.  I knew 8 years ago <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> that > > >> 
    turning points could not be known ahead of time and I still know it. 
    > If > 
    > >> they could, some traders would almost never have a losing 
    trade. > > >> 
    > > >> At 11:06 AM 10/22/00 EDT, you 
    wrote: > > >> > I'm not 
    one for posting much in a group. How every, this talk about <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >Pattern <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >> >Smasher, and NP. Has brought me to the point I 
    want to say something > > >> 
    >concerning Mr.Ed Kasanjian. > > 
    >> > > > >> > His 
    comments about the software, has restored my faith in man kind, 
    > and > 
    > >his > > >> 
    >workings to gain better understanding and trying to move ahead, 
    > through <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >his > > 
    >> >experience and knowledge base. <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >> > I believe that, Mr. Ed Kasanjian has made a 
    giant step forward, and > "we" 
    > > >as <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >> >traders should encourage him to move forward 
    in his abilities for > writing 
    > > >a <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >> >better program based off of his studies and 
    experience. > > >> > Just 
    wish companies like "Omega" would take a giant step forward, 
    > they <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >may > > 
    >> >learn a thing or two. > 
    > >> > > > >> 
    >One last thing I would like to say,  I would really like to 
    see, > "Pattern <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >> >Smasher" <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >> >up graded to a windows base, using 
    C++ or VBA Programing. > > >> 
    > > > >> >Happy Trading 
    to all. > > >> > 
    > > >> >Randy Cole 
    > > >> > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >> > <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
    to: > > >> 
    >realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >> > > > 
    >> > > > >> 
    > > > >> > 
    > > >> > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > >> > 
    > >> > > >> 
    > > >> To unsubscribe from this 
    group, send an email to: > > 
    >> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > >> > > 
    >> > > >> 
    > > > <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > > > > 
    > > > >To unsubscribe from 
    this group, send an email to: > > 
    >realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > > > > 
    > > > > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > > > 
    > > > > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > > 
    > > > To unsubscribe from this 
    group, send an email to: > > 
    realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx > 
    > > > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> > > 
    > <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > To unsubscribe from this 
    group, send an email to: > 
    realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>> > <FONT 
    face=Arial size=2>> 
    -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor 
    -------------------------~-~> eGroups 
    eLerts It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, 
    it's Free! <A 
    href="http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/0/_/152424/_/973068371/"; 
    target=_blank>http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/0/_/152424/_/973068371/ 
    <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> 
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
    to: <FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx 
     << File: 
    SPX.X&Interval=60&Ht=400&Wd=600&Display=0&Study=&Param1=&Param2=&Param3=&FontSize=10&BgColor=0.255.0&TBgColor=0.255.0 
    >> To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx






eGroups Sponsor




<img width="468" height="60"
  border="0"
  alt=""
  src="http://adimg.egroups.com/img/9664/0/_/152424/_/973114368/WarningSmBusiness468x602E.gif";>









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx





Attachment: Description: "Stig1.gif"