|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Maybe you are one of the few that is correct 100% of the time. If you
are not one of the richest men in the US. then maybe it is just an illusion?
At 04:15 PM 10/22/00 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>From: "Phil" <rhodes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 2:40 PM
>Subject: Re: [RT] Software - Pattern Smasher
>
> "I knew 8 years ago that turning points could not be known ahead of time
>and I still know it. If
>> they could, some traders would almost never have a losing trade"
>
>
>Phil,
>
> Check your ephemeris. Mercury turned Retrograde Oct. 18, 2000, 9:41 AM
>ET, at 15-45 Scorpio which equals 225-45 degrees on the Zodiac. 3 cycles of
>360 degrees is 1080 degrees. Add 225-45 + 1080 = 1305-45 or in decimal form
>1305.75. What was the time and price of the low for the cash S&P 500 on
>October 18, the most recent swing low?
>
> Still skeptical? Of course! Say that was hindsight? Ok, Uranus will turn
>Direct at 16deg.54min. Aquarius or 316-54 on the Zodiac on October 26, 2000,
>at 11:23 AM. Uranus rules electronics,
>computers, broadcasting, etc. Look for a key change in trend for the market
>led by those market sectors at that time. Primary harmonic for the S&P will
>be 1396. Other major harmonics for that time are: Outer planet (i.e.
>Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto) Directs and Retrogrades usually
>generate a change in trend for the market within one day of the planetary
>event.
>
>180 = 1216
>120 = 1276
> 90 = 1306
> 60 = 1336
> 60 = 1456
> 90 = 1486
>120 = 1516
>180 = 1576
>
> Please note that the Uranus Direct is less than one degree of being a
>square (90 degrees) to Mercury Retrograde at 15-45 Scorpio thereby
>reinforcing the harmonics generated by the previous planetary retrograde.
>Let's see if there is anything to this or perhaps the past 30 years of my
>research has been an "illusion" Conversely, if it looks as it has merit, are
>you willing to follow the "yellow brick road"?
>
>
>Good Trading,
>
>Norman Winski
>
>
>
>.
>What was the l
>
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Phil" <rhodes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 2:40 PM
>Subject: Re: [RT] Software - Pattern Smasher
>
>
>>
>>
>> Better be carefull of what you wish for. Seems "Omega" may be doing
>the
>> same thing. Have a product then offer a new product and not support the
>> older product. It seems they may even go to internet only and not support
>> the stand alone stuff in the near future? Lets hope not. That giant step
>> forward seems to cost the ones (little guys) who are paying for it a lot.
>> Of course the companies sell the new stuff for more money.
>> Also read in an earlier post that it now looks like NP was sold as an
>> illusion? The maker of the software seems to have said that looking back
>> it was just an illusion as far as trading turning points. I say stay away
>> from illusions. Even if you think they work.
>> I just don't like that kind of giant steps, especially if I am paying
>for
>> those giant steps, after I paid for the baby steps in the first place. I
>> also wouldn't be to fond of paying for something that is now being called
>> an illusion that doesn't work.
>> Enough of this stuff. Not all, but most of the stuff sold is junk, and
>we
>> just have to live with it. Buyer beware. And don't expect a refund even
>> if the stuff have been shown to be an illusion. I knew 8 years ago that
>> turning points could not be known ahead of time and I still know it. If
>> they could, some traders would almost never have a losing trade.
>>
>> At 11:06 AM 10/22/00 EDT, you wrote:
>> > I'm not one for posting much in a group. How every, this talk about
>Pattern
>> >Smasher, and NP. Has brought me to the point I want to say something
>> >concerning Mr.Ed Kasanjian.
>> >
>> > His comments about the software, has restored my faith in man kind, and
>his
>> >workings to gain better understanding and trying to move ahead, through
>his
>> >experience and knowledge base.
>> > I believe that, Mr. Ed Kasanjian has made a giant step forward, and "we"
>as
>> >traders should encourage him to move forward in his abilities for writing
>a
>> >better program based off of his studies and experience.
>> > Just wish companies like "Omega" would take a giant step forward, they
>may
>> >learn a thing or two.
>> >
>> >One last thing I would like to say, I would really like to see, "Pattern
>> >Smasher"
>> >up graded to a windows base, using C++ or VBA Programing.
>> >
>> >Happy Trading to all.
>> >
>> >Randy Cole
>> >
>> >
>> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> >realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/0/_/152424/_/972250723/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
|