|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
----- Original Message -----
From: Dom Perrino <domenick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: David Neeran <dneeran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Buy Signal Given on Nasdaq
> Your figure is close enough. Actually it is 3723.67. The high of the
> previous low day on a closing basis not penetration basis only
> Dom----- Original Message -----
> From: David Neeran <dneeran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <domenick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 1:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Buy Signal Given on Nasdaq
>
>
> > Hey Dom,
> > Do you have a re-entry level? I understand there is a FIB
> > level about here, 3720? Would appreciate your support and resistance
> > levels for NASDAQ. Oh, I was wrong in three trades this morning,
> > just part of the business.
> >
> >
> > >From: "Dom Perrino" <domenick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Reply-To: "Dom Perrino" <domenick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >To: "<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> \"Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\""
> > ><realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Subject: [RT] Re: Buy Signal Given on Nasdaq
> > >Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 12:31:27 -0400
> > >
> > >I base my signals on technical analysis not on gut feeing.If anyone
bases
> > >their buy/sell signals on gut feeling then I agree with you . I will
see
> if
> > >I can locate my posting on 09/01/00 where I cited just a few of them.
It
> > >seems unnecessary to me to post indicators every time .Most technicians
> use
> > >the same indicators that they prefer ( over other indicators used by
> other
> > >technicians).Technical analysis is an art not a science. You don't
> discard
> > >them if they don't catch exact tops or bottoms.When I get a signal on
the
> > >Dow Jones that signal applies applies to the entire stock market It
> > >represents a change in trend A signal given only by the Nasdaq needs a
> > >follow up Confirming signal by the Dow Jones. I explainrd this in the
> > >recent posting. Read the print not just the Heading.
> > >Dom--- Original Message -----
> > > From: James Taylor
> > > To: Dom Perrino ; Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 11:27 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Buy Signal Given on Nasdaq
> > >
> > >
> > > Key support levels are not broken on the Nasdaq, we still have
higher
> > >lows.
> > > Until these levels are taken out, I will not short the index
futures.
> > > Instead, I am short a ton of individual stocks. The advance/decline
> > >line is heading steadily lower,
> > > clearly indicating the fact that more stocks are going down than up.
> > >It's a numbers game,
> > > diversify, and short a basket of stocks, each of which is in a clear
> > >downtrend, use trailing stops, and take profits on large overextended
> > >drops. This recipe has worked well so far for me. Can't wait to short
> the
> > >Nasdaq index, US dollar index.
> > > Am short a few US T-Bonds. Blurting that it is 'a buy signal' for
a
> > >index based on nothing but gut feel opinion does nobody any good, CNBC
is
> a
> > >great source for such nonsense.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Dom Perrino
> > > To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:17 AM
> > > Subject: [RT] Re: Buy Signal Given on Nasdaq
> > >
> >
_________________________________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
> >
> > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> > http://profiles.msn.com.
> >
> >
>
|