[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: Long run still ahead for stocks - Ralph Acampora


  • To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [RT] Re: Long run still ahead for stocks - Ralph Acampora
  • From: "Don Ewers" <dbewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 23:28:45 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <LPBBIKLFNLAMNNMLDELPIEMKCFAA.inbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I am reminded of the saying "even a blind squirrel can find a acorn once in
a while".

Ralph has had a cold hand of late and is even considered a contrary
indicator by some. Perhaps this has occurred due to less actual predicting
and too much television time which requires one to deliver the goods in a
split second with no chance to change one's opinion when the conditions
warrant it. He has definitely been out of synch by my viewing over the last
1 1/2 years.

That said, I never was able to imagine these levels, PE's or gigantic market
caps having not recognized what money flows can do to a market and are still
doing in my opinion. The game of musical chairs continues and where it stops
nobody knows (even CSCO "may" be about to lose its chair?).

don ewers

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Taylor" <jptaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 12:51 AM
Subject: [RT] Re: Long run still ahead for stocks - Ralph Acampora


> Agreed, it is also not the purpose of this list to make dieties of these
> talking heads as well.
> The opinions of these stock-peddlers have no place on this list.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ckn" <pt@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <jptaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 10:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Long run still ahead for stocks - Ralph Acampora
>
>
> > > Who the hell is Acumpora ?
> >
> > > He'll be singing his song the day the bubble bursts too,
> > > and will yell "SELL" near the very bottom,  Just watch.
> >
> >
> > RTs,
> >
> >  Before knocking Acampora, we must consider how many of us had the
courage
> > to stand up and say Dow 7000 and follow that up with 7001 when the
present
> > levels were not even conceived.
> >
> > Whether or not Acampora will be proved right or not is not for us decide
> but
> > we certainly can deliberate on it. It would be better to be temperate
> about
> > the whole thing. We exist to discuss and not to tear down others.- a
point
> > which is only too frequently made on the forum but continuously missed.
> >
> > Dr.Narayan
> > Mumbai, India.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>