[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] FUT: T-Bonds v. T-Notes



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>While we all know that, since the Notes became the 
bench mark, the volume of the Bonds has fallen and the volume on the Notes has 
increased, but what does all this mean for the average small 
trader?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What do list members think the future holds for the 
short, middle and distant terms?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>From my standpoint, as a day trader of the T-Bonds, 
I have not noticed any difference in the bid/ask spread, getting filled, range, 
volatility or anything else (outside DBC satellite feed producing less and less 
ticks, which I assume is them and not the instrument!).&nbsp; What I do know is 
that the comparison between the two shows only too clearly to me that I still 
want to trade the bonds and not the notes.&nbsp; In simple terms I would have to 
spend and risk twice the amount on the notes to achieve virtually the same on 
the bonds.&nbsp; However, I have never traded the notes and do not know what the 
spread or slippage is like.&nbsp; Can anyone confirm what they are?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The fact that some of the big players are not 
finding the bonds much to their liking matters not to me, so long as the spread, 
slippage and getting filled on my small numbers is still 
excellent.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also, of course, the bonds still (and I hope will go on 
doing so!) display that very readable quality, which is naturally the vital key, 
so far as I am concerned.&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>However, one does have to keep an eye on the future 
and with the benchmark changing to 10 yrs rather than 30 yrs, it is possible 
that the character of the bonds could change.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; They may well 
have changed already with the big traders, but I have not noticed anything from 
my stand point.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I would be interested to learn of other peoples 
views on the two instruments and particularly on the trading of the 
notes...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bill Eykyn<BR><A 
href="http://www.t-bondtrader.com";>www.t-bondtrader.com</A><BR>"Learn to read 
the tape"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>
Attachment Converted: "f:\eudora\attach\Bonds&Notes.gif"