[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: S&P "adjustments" Was: Top Five Admissions We'll Never Hear From Any Investment Guru onTV (MOTLEY FOOL)


  • To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [RT] Re: S&P "adjustments" Was: Top Five Admissions We'll Never Hear From Any Investment Guru onTV (MOTLEY FOOL)
  • From: "Kent Rollins" <kentr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 22:32:32 -0700

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I don't know how today's frequency compares to yesteryear, but I have very
serious concerns about some of the companies they are adding.  FleckenBear
pointed out that one company swap on the S&P index earlier this year dropped
a company with $12 billion in revenues and added a company with $1 billion
in revenues.  Presumably, the S&P folks use industry percentages and market
capitalizations to determine which companies to add/remove, but if you were
to combine a hundred or so of these moves with an economic downturn, the S&P
would hit a fairly serious air pocket.  I'm not quite as cynical about the
state of the markets as Bill is, but I have to agree with him that this kind
of thing only works well in a strong bull market.

Kent


-----Original Message-----
From: Howard Hopkins <hehohop@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, June 30, 2000 12:34 PM
Subject: [RT] Re: Top Five Admissions We'll Never Hear From Any Investment
Guru onTV (MOTLEY FOOL)


Any historians out there know if Standard & Poors has always droppped and
added companies to the S&P 500 as frequently as they do now?  The frequent
readjustments may make indexing a more steady growth vehicle during
multi-year down/flat cycles.  Comments?

Howard