|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: [RT] Re: June 8th "Significant Market Move" ?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">If someone makes an observation and feels like it is something they would like to share with the group and so they do, only to be mocked and scoffed at by many in the group, how many more times will that person be willing to share their ideas? Take the information and file it where you think it is appropriate, but allow other people the opportunity to express their ideas without getting blasted. If we allow free expression, eventually one of those ideas may ultimately help you be a better trader. </FONT></P>
<UL>
<P><A NAME="_MailData"><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">-----Original Message-----</FONT></A>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">From: Terry Smith [SMTP:tesla@xxxxxxx]</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Sent: </FONT></B> <FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Wednesday, June 07, 2000 9:57 AM</FONT>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">To: </FONT></B> <FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial"><realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></FONT>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Cc: </FONT></B> <FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Subject: </FONT></B> <FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">[RT] Re: June 8th "Significant Market Move" ?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">I will put it in my file labeled "BEWARE OF STRANGERS BEARING GIFTS" I now</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">realize a broken clock is right twice a day. Happy trading</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">----- Original Message -----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">From: "Gwenael Gautier" <ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:15 AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Subject: [RT] Re: June 8th "Significant Market Move" ?</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> Rebecca Nolan has been predicting big crashes ahead ever since her first</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">flyer</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> found its way into my mailbox. THis must be the 173rd... Now on every</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> subsequent flyer she claimed being right between 85and 99% of the time. So</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">I</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> can only assume what she calls a crash is a 2% down day.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> THIS IS A PURE PIECE OF SHIT. Treausre it, it will remind you always of</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">all</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> the pitfalls out there..</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> Gwenn</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> Jpilleafe@xxxxxxx wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > In a message dated 6/6/00 2:33:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">tesla@xxxxxxx</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > writes:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> ></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > << Rebecca Nolan is predicting big down day on the 8th >></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> ></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > Hello,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> ></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > Another reason in my mind to expect a rally. Ha.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> ></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > Has anyone found Rebecca Nolan's work to be tradeable?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > Anyone made money trading off predicted directions on turn dates?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > I would be curious. I have not found her work to be useable.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > I receive promotional mailings with all sorts of predictions.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > And as with most advisory service publications,...despite being</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > seemingly specific, the forecasts seem rather undependable in my</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">opinion.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> ></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > Also Norman's post : "you may want to mark June 8-9 on your trading</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > calendars for a significant market move." isn't very specific for what</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">he</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > would expect either. Norman, would you expect that such a significant</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > market move would be to the upside or the downside? Thanks in adance.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> ></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> > Regards, JIM Pilliod</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">></FONT>
<BR>
</P>
</UL>
</BODY>
</HTML></x-html>From ???@??? Wed Jun 07 10:48:52 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.pajo.com (mail.pajo.com [216.116.96.4])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA16276
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:52:33 -0700
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM ([208.179.56.198])
by mail.pajo.com (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA24293;
Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:48:49 -0700
Received: from esrelay002.caissedesdepots.fr by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.0.3.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 09:37:16 -0700
Received: from esmailfed2.serv.cdc.fr (esmailfed2 [158.156.1.207])
by esrelay002.caissedesdepots.fr (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA11752;
Wed, 7 Jun 2000 18:43:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from cmi.cdc.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by esmailfed2.serv.cdc.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA15907;
Wed, 7 Jun 2000 18:42:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from eiche.fkt.cmi.net. by cmi.cdc.fr (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-SVR4)
id SAA05591; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 18:41:32 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from cdc-gmbh.de by eiche.fkt.cmi.net. (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-SVR4)
id SAA18380; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 18:41:31 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <393E7B7A.DAFAE710@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 18:42:34 +0200
From: Gwenael Gautier <ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: CDC Marches FKT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RT] Re: June 8th "Significant Market Move" ?
References: <C055AF5D5DD1D2119C2700805F1582F004B750D5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDRcpt-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Not sure I got Steve's mail correctly:
1 - I fully agree with Steve's mail content, but don't understand why it
comes up now
2 - I didn't bash anyone, and if it appears as such, it is all the
contrary, I found Terry's quote better than my analogy.
3 - I didn't understand Terry was ripping me apart, I thought he agreed
with the ideas expressed, but maybe I am wrong.
4 - If I am wrong, then fine, I don't mind at all. Everyone cares for
himself in the end.
Best to all,
Gwenn
"Merkley, Steve" wrote:
>
>
> If someone makes an observation and feels like it is something they
> would like to share with the group and so they do, only to be mocked
> and scoffed at by many in the group, how many more times will that
> person be willing to share their ideas? Take the information and file
> it where you think it is appropriate, but allow other people the
> opportunity to express their ideas without getting blasted. If we
> allow free expression, eventually one of those ideas may ultimately
> help you be a better trader.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Smith [SMTP:tesla@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 9:57 AM
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [RT] Re: June 8th "Significant Market Move" ?
>
> I will put it in my file labeled "BEWARE OF STRANGERS BEARING
> GIFTS" I now
> realize a broken clock is right twice a day. Happy trading
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gwenael Gautier" <ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:15 AM
> Subject: [RT] Re: June 8th "Significant Market Move" ?
>
> > Rebecca Nolan has been predicting big crashes ahead ever since
> her first
> flyer
> > found its way into my mailbox. THis must be the 173rd... Now on
> every
> > subsequent flyer she claimed being right between 85and 99% of
> the time. So
> I
> > can only assume what she calls a crash is a 2% down day.
> >
> > THIS IS A PURE PIECE OF SHIT. Treausre it, it will remind you
> always of
> all
> > the pitfalls out there..
> >
> > Gwenn
> >
> >
> > Jpilleafe@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > In a message dated 6/6/00 2:33:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> tesla@xxxxxxx
> > > writes:
> > >
> > > << Rebecca Nolan is predicting big down day on the 8th >>
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Another reason in my mind to expect a rally. Ha.
> > >
> > > Has anyone found Rebecca Nolan's work to be tradeable?
> > > Anyone made money trading off predicted directions on turn
> dates?
> > > I would be curious. I have not found her work to be useable.
>
> > > I receive promotional mailings with all sorts of predictions.
>
> > > And as with most advisory service publications,...despite
> being
> > > seemingly specific, the forecasts seem rather undependable in
> my
> opinion.
> > >
> > > Also Norman's post : "you may want to mark June 8-9 on your
> trading
> > > calendars for a significant market move." isn't very
> specific for what
> he
> > > would expect either. Norman, would you expect that such a
> significant
> > > market move would be to the upside or the downside? Thanks
> in adance.
> > >
> > > Regards, JIM Pilliod
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
|