[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Will be posting my SP 500 neural inputs soon....



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3616.1301"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hi Scot,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I have answered everything you've addressed in your email in 
prior posts to RT. I suggest you go back and <STRONG><FONT color=#0000ff 
face=Arial size=2>read </FONT></STRONG>them all, especially if your comment 
about wanting to</FONT><FONT size=2> know more about NN's is true.&nbsp; Also, 
I'm going to post all of my inputs to the models to my web address in a few days 
because I'm so damn sick of RT police and deputy sherrifs pestering the heck out 
of me for no good reason.&nbsp; Advertising, Advertising, Advertising.&nbsp; You 
people make me sick.&nbsp; Hopefully all of the Normans and Scots of the world 
can jump on some other non-deserving soles now. Maybe another innocent twelve 
year old who beats the pants off 99% of the &quot;so-called traders&quot;on RT 
would suffice for you two such as happened about a year ago when the kid turned 
a 300% profit in one month.&nbsp; He was reamed by numerous RT's.&nbsp; We 
demand proof they said.&nbsp; You're a liar they said.&nbsp; Leave the kid alone 
and leave all the innocent people alone.&nbsp; Oh yeah, I will be providing all 
of my proprietary inputs in detail to one deserving RT whose character has been 
exemplary throughout this whole ordeal.&nbsp; Sorry, it's not you or 
Norman.&nbsp; It's someone with the innocence of my three year-old nephew who 
knows what advertising is and isn't.&nbsp; Fortunately, this RT is sworn to 
confidentiality.&nbsp; Also, do me and yourself a big favor and call Carl Cook, 
President of Biocomp Systems, and ask him if I am in any way affiliated with the 
profitability of his firm. Or better yet, why didn't you call him before you 
posted your Advertising accusations.&nbsp; Guilty until proven innocent.&nbsp; 
Gee, I don't think that's the philosophy this country was founded on.&nbsp; It 
shouldn't be the philosophy of this discussion group but unfortunately a few of 
you make life miserable for the good intentioned.&nbsp; Someone please tell me 
the procedure for removing myself from RT's.&nbsp; - Thanks, Brian</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
    <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From: 
    </B>Scot Billington &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><B>To: 
    </B>Mindspring &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:blee7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>blee7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><B>Date: 
    </B>Saturday, February 05, 2000 6:57 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: [RT] 
    Brian-Please quit posting ads.<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>If you are not affiliated with BioTech, then I 
    apologize.&nbsp; If you are and they sell these models, then you have posted 
    ads.&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>The point is not profitability; the point is 
    advertising.&nbsp; RT is a place to teach and learn.&nbsp; You posted some 
    profits that were allegedly gained by a neural net.&nbsp; You did not 
    describe how to develop a neural net, why you find this trading best, how 
    profits are obtained, the time frame, types of indicators etc.&nbsp; You 
    well know that some posted figures fall far short of proving that neural 
    nets have any ability to predict.&nbsp; Maybe they do.&nbsp; Make a post 
    about education not trumpeting some past success.&nbsp; How do they 
    work?&nbsp; How do you create one?&nbsp; Do you have to be a computer 
    wiz?&nbsp; Technical or fundamental input?&nbsp; I would be very interested 
    to learn something about all of that.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Again, if you are not affiliated and have nothing to gain 
    by Biotech selling more systems, then I apologize.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Sincerely,</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Scot Billington</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Dec 01 06:58:51 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
	by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id HAA12022
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 07:26:49 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
	([208.179.56.198])
	by mail.thetrellis.net; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 06:17:50 -0800
Received: from mail5.globalserve.net by realtraders.com
	with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 06:14:54 +0000
Received: from stock2 (dialin82.hamilton.globalserve.net [209.90.138.145])
	by mail5.globalserve.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA56734
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 09:16:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <009601c05a0e$b48486c0$628a5ad1@xxxxxx>
Reply-To: "Scalp1" <Scalp1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Scalp1" <Scalp1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] Tradestation 4.0 Y2K Patch {01}
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:14:35 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0093_01C059E4.CAA1F0C0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: Scalp1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Has anyone used the Y2K patch for tradestaion 4.0, I am 
starting to get global errors when I run my chart scanner, I was wondering if 
its Y2K related with tradestation 4.0 ? I&nbsp; have not tried the patch yet and 
wanted to know from the group does it work or do i have to give Omega more of my 
money for 2000i.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Thanks in advance</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jan 01 08:09:56 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
	by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id FAA05175
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 1 Jan 2000 05:01:19 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
	([208.179.56.198])
	by mail.thetrellis.net; Sat, 01 Jan 2000 03:55:02 -0800
Received: from zethes.pt.lu by realtraders.com
	with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 01 Jan 2000 03:50:51 +0000
Received: from default (ppp01-0708-061.pt.lu [195.46.252.61])
	by zethes.pt.lu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA20100;
	Sat, 1 Jan 2000 12:52:28 +0100 (MET)
Reply-To: <gledhill@xxxxx>
From: "Judith Gledhill / Mark Oliver" <gledhill@xxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] RE: Re: Gen: Dr. John posts
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 12:51:28 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBIOJJABGBIIFMAMNMAEBNCBAA.gledhill@xxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <NDBBKOPBHAGFMBOOPGONAEFDCLAA.jsnowden@xxxxxxxx>
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: gledhill@xxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

i dont write so often but i always write when guys are critical of guys who
try to predict ,as any and i mean real traders and not fakes will agree
you have to have an opionion i dont want to be a member if we are just post
event armchair reader digest readers ... this happened with the gold
contributor 4 months ago ...... you can delete his messages but stop being a
sad hyper critical whinger
i only help guys on forex anyone can read my model page
www.paratechnics.pair.com
you are not forced to, its forward looking am just trying to help does that
make it a spam no it doesnt i dont need anyone thinking this thats why about
30 banks forex traders look at my page i work for one of those banks i am
just trying to help others
for the year 2000 lets stop criticizing endlessly the guys who try to help
dr john capello has written some great stock calls  even i was intrigued
enough to do alittle research and made some nice money
so to all you critics show me some money  ideas and then you can cast the
stones until then please shutup

-----Original Message-----
From: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Jimmy Snowden
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 10:15 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RT] Re: Gen: Dr. John posts


I would suggest the moderator of this list determine if Dr. John's posts are
in keeping with the rules.  If not in keeping with the rules let him stop
his posts if in keeping let him email the information to those that are
interested in his guru predictions.  A guru is for tyros not realtraders.

If anyone can tell me how to contact the moderator please email me
privately.


Thanks,


Jimmy