PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3616.1301"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hi Scot,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I have answered everything you've addressed in your email in
prior posts to RT. I suggest you go back and <STRONG><FONT color=#0000ff
face=Arial size=2>read </FONT></STRONG>them all, especially if your comment
about wanting to</FONT><FONT size=2> know more about NN's is true. Also,
I'm going to post all of my inputs to the models to my web address in a few days
because I'm so damn sick of RT police and deputy sherrifs pestering the heck out
of me for no good reason. Advertising, Advertising, Advertising. You
people make me sick. Hopefully all of the Normans and Scots of the world
can jump on some other non-deserving soles now. Maybe another innocent twelve
year old who beats the pants off 99% of the "so-called traders"on RT
would suffice for you two such as happened about a year ago when the kid turned
a 300% profit in one month. He was reamed by numerous RT's. We
demand proof they said. You're a liar they said. Leave the kid alone
and leave all the innocent people alone. Oh yeah, I will be providing all
of my proprietary inputs in detail to one deserving RT whose character has been
exemplary throughout this whole ordeal. Sorry, it's not you or
Norman. It's someone with the innocence of my three year-old nephew who
knows what advertising is and isn't. Fortunately, this RT is sworn to
confidentiality. Also, do me and yourself a big favor and call Carl Cook,
President of Biocomp Systems, and ask him if I am in any way affiliated with the
profitability of his firm. Or better yet, why didn't you call him before you
posted your Advertising accusations. Guilty until proven innocent.
Gee, I don't think that's the philosophy this country was founded on. It
shouldn't be the philosophy of this discussion group but unfortunately a few of
you make life miserable for the good intentioned. Someone please tell me
the procedure for removing myself from RT's. - Thanks, Brian</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Scot Billington <<A
href="mailto:scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx">scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>Mindspring <<A
href="mailto:blee7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx">blee7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Saturday, February 05, 2000 6:57 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: [RT]
Brian-Please quit posting ads.<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If you are not affiliated with BioTech, then I
apologize. If you are and they sell these models, then you have posted
ads. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The point is not profitability; the point is
advertising. RT is a place to teach and learn. You posted some
profits that were allegedly gained by a neural net. You did not
describe how to develop a neural net, why you find this trading best, how
profits are obtained, the time frame, types of indicators etc. You
well know that some posted figures fall far short of proving that neural
nets have any ability to predict. Maybe they do. Make a post
about education not trumpeting some past success. How do they
work? How do you create one? Do you have to be a computer
wiz? Technical or fundamental input? I would be very interested
to learn something about all of that.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Again, if you are not affiliated and have nothing to gain
by Biotech selling more systems, then I apologize.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Sincerely,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Scot Billington</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Dec 01 06:58:51 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id HAA12022
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 07:26:49 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 06:17:50 -0800
Received: from mail5.globalserve.net by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 06:14:54 +0000
Received: from stock2 (dialin82.hamilton.globalserve.net [209.90.138.145])
by mail5.globalserve.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA56734
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 09:16:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <009601c05a0e$b48486c0$628a5ad1@xxxxxx>
Reply-To: "Scalp1" <Scalp1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Scalp1" <Scalp1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] Tradestation 4.0 Y2K Patch {01}
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:14:35 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0093_01C059E4.CAA1F0C0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: Scalp1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Has anyone used the Y2K patch for tradestaion 4.0, I am
starting to get global errors when I run my chart scanner, I was wondering if
its Y2K related with tradestation 4.0 ? I have not tried the patch yet and
wanted to know from the group does it work or do i have to give Omega more of my
money for 2000i.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Thanks in advance</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jan 01 08:09:56 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id FAA05175
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 1 Jan 2000 05:01:19 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Sat, 01 Jan 2000 03:55:02 -0800
Received: from zethes.pt.lu by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 01 Jan 2000 03:50:51 +0000
Received: from default (ppp01-0708-061.pt.lu [195.46.252.61])
by zethes.pt.lu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA20100;
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 12:52:28 +0100 (MET)
Reply-To: <gledhill@xxxxx>
From: "Judith Gledhill / Mark Oliver" <gledhill@xxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] RE: Re: Gen: Dr. John posts
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 12:51:28 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBIOJJABGBIIFMAMNMAEBNCBAA.gledhill@xxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <NDBBKOPBHAGFMBOOPGONAEFDCLAA.jsnowden@xxxxxxxx>
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: gledhill@xxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
i dont write so often but i always write when guys are critical of guys who
try to predict ,as any and i mean real traders and not fakes will agree
you have to have an opionion i dont want to be a member if we are just post
event armchair reader digest readers ... this happened with the gold
contributor 4 months ago ...... you can delete his messages but stop being a
sad hyper critical whinger
i only help guys on forex anyone can read my model page
www.paratechnics.pair.com
you are not forced to, its forward looking am just trying to help does that
make it a spam no it doesnt i dont need anyone thinking this thats why about
30 banks forex traders look at my page i work for one of those banks i am
just trying to help others
for the year 2000 lets stop criticizing endlessly the guys who try to help
dr john capello has written some great stock calls even i was intrigued
enough to do alittle research and made some nice money
so to all you critics show me some money ideas and then you can cast the
stones until then please shutup
-----Original Message-----
From: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Jimmy Snowden
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 10:15 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RT] Re: Gen: Dr. John posts
I would suggest the moderator of this list determine if Dr. John's posts are
in keeping with the rules. If not in keeping with the rules let him stop
his posts if in keeping let him email the information to those that are
interested in his guru predictions. A guru is for tyros not realtraders.
If anyone can tell me how to contact the moderator please email me
privately.
Thanks,
Jimmy
|