|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
<BR>Hi Real Traders,
<BR>I've been trying to post the charts for this without success for the
last 5 days so
<BR>I 've put a direct web link to them <A HREF="http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~ellsann/index6.html";>Retrograde
- Direct planets as a cycle timer</A>
<BR>http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~ellsann/index6.html
<BR>This is a simple technique that anyone can use. The planets when viewed
from earth will at certain times <U>appear</U> to go backwards. This
means that they will cover the same degree of the circle going forward
(direct) and backwards (retrograde)
<BR>To use this in trading have a look at the degree of a planets position
when a major swing high or low is made and then expect a reversal of trend
when the planet again crosses this degree.
<BR>An example using Saturn retrograde / direct on the S+P.
<BR>Saturn was at 45.25 degrees while retrograde on October 18th 1999
<BR>which was a low. The next time that Saturn crossed this exact degree
while direct was on the 28-29th of March 2000 with the actual high being
on friday the 24th of March giving us three trading days from the top.
<BR>Another example of retrograde / direct cycles for longer term forecasts.
<BR>is seen in the chart of the British pound.
<BR>At point 1 Uranus is at 315.91 degrees while retrograde. At point 2
<BR>Uranus is again at 315.91 degrees while direct.
<BR>If any other astro inclined posters would like to share their examples
I think that it may open the eyes of the more open minded members
of real traders to a simple but
<BR>worth while technique.
<BR>Regards
<BR>Myles Wilson Walker
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR> </HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Apr 21 20:15:58 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from waltt1.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA13757
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 19:54:39 -0700
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by waltt1.thetrellis.net; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 19:56:41 -0700
Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.0.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 19:47:28 -0700
Received: from ibm (1Cust52.tnt1.blythe.ca.da.uu.net [63.25.4.52])
by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA19458;
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 19:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <00d201bfac05$a63ea300$bb0cfea9@xxx>
From: "BobR" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <NDBBJINBMLFPEGGKKJEKOEPFCMAA.OnWingsOfEagles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Microsoft case
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 19:51:21 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDRcpt-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status: O
GB, tell us when you are going to sell some of those high implied volatility
puts in the next 8 days.
BR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gitanshu Buch" <OnWingsOfEagles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 5:59 PM
Subject: GEN: Microsoft case
> Came across this snippet courtesy Dan Gillmor's column in the Mercury News
> (siliconvalley.com):
>
> Thought it may fire up some vocal chords in the programmer community of
this
> list.
>
> "Since the Microsoft antitrust case affects computer users like yourself,
we
> invite you to send your constructive ideas for ending the Microsoft
> monopoly. Messages for posting should be limited to 2500 characters; no
> vulgarity or profanity"
>
> - California Attorney General's Office.
>
> http://justice.hdcdojnet.state.ca.us/msgboard/
>
> FYI - the AGs have 8 calendar days to submit their recommendations to the
> Justice Dept.
>
> Finally: I presume all of us are mature enough to know that this subject
has
> nothing to do with trading <g> except maybe trying to figure out if the
> selling will be done on Judgement Day...
>
> So far, it looks like a bear, talks like a bear (revenue growth next year
> low teens per yesterday's conference call guidance) and of course, walks
> like a bear - so it must be a bear... but then, the market works in
> mysterious ways.
>
> B
>
> Gitanshu
>
> Disclosure: I have no position in MSFT and have no opinion regarding the
> Findings of Fact or subsequent legal actions. I do have personal friends
in
> MSFT and its competitor companies.
>
>
>
|