|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Greetings,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I am switching to Futuresource and my FS sales guy says that I
can get the 1 M KU dish required for less than they charge elsewhere.
Anyone have a good dish co to recommend? I am in LA, so Southern CA or
mail order would work best.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Thanks in advance,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Chris</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Apr 08 21:29:50 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from waltt1.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA01905
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 8 Apr 2000 19:23:01 -0700
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by waltt1.thetrellis.net; Sat, 08 Apr 2000 19:24:28 -0700
Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.0.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 08 Apr 2000 19:15:30 -0700
Received: from earthlink.net (pool0174.cvx6-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.178.158.174])
by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA29189;
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 19:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <38EFE935.9FC4FD28@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 19:21:43 -0700
From: ericrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RT] Re: Non- Manipulation of Stock Market
References: <20000407201844.11986.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx> <38EF58A1.D9DFDB15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: ericrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDRcpt-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: ericrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
If the trend is up then a new story that causes selling should be absorbed by
the market in the first few (1-2) hours. This was not the case with MSFT
news. The market continued to decline all day
and into most of the next day. Clearly the trend was down and the news
accelerated the decline.
Norman E
.
Daniel Goncharoff wrote:
>
> This brings up a question that has been bothering me: why would the Microsoft
> ruling be negative for the Naz. Many more companies would benefit from a
> break-up then would suffer.
>
> Did anyone on this list think, oooooh, I should sell because of the ruling, or
> know anyone else who thought that way?
>
> Right now, that 'explanation' smells like media bs...
>
> Regards
> DanG
>
> "Dr. John Cappello" wrote:
>
> > I believe your conclusions are correct to a point.What caused the volume and
> > volatility swings were negative guru comments and Microsoft anti-trust
> > rumors which brought out the weak and the strong hands in the same day.
> >
> > These are phenominal trading opportunities.Based upon this I am giving
> > consideration to fully capitalize an e-mini Nasdaq for 4000 points or
> > $80,000.If you are right on any position you will win.If you are wrong you
> > can pretty well gut it out to a reversal.Not for the faint hearted.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > John
> >
> > >From: Ronald McEwan <rmac@xxxxxxxx>
> > >Reply-To: rmac@xxxxxxxx
> > >To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Subject: [RT] Re: US Govt. Manipulation of Stock Market
> > >Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 15:16:21 -0400
> > >
> > >I was examining what had happened Tuesday to see what useful information
> > >could be obtained. I did a study of the relationship of volatility and
> > >volume. I used the NYA index because it reports volume. I used the high
> > >low statistical volatility for the volatility measure. I took the 20 day
> > >average of both the total NYA volume and the high low statistical
> > >volatility measure. Based on my results, I believe that with a continued
> > >increase in daily volume on the exchanges, that there will be a
> > >subsequent increase in volatility. With the increased volatility you will
> > >see 500 and 600 point swings on the INDU and NASDAQ more frequently. The
> > >exchanges are doing everything then can to increase volume, so make sure
> > >you keep a good supply of aspirin. I think what happened Tuesday was due
> > >partly to the huge increase in volume we have been seeing. The greater
> > >the volume, the greater the volatility, the greater the intraday swings.
> > >We have seen this already in the Internet stocks exhibiting the same
> > >behavior.
> > >
> > >Ron McEwan
> > >
> > >high low statistical volatility formula:
> > >
> > >=(0.627*SQRT(365.25)*LN(High/Low))
> > ><< volatility_volume.gif >>
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|