|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I've lost the toolbars on my TradeStation 2000
chart screens and am unable to get them back..</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>I've tried View, Screen, Toolbars, but to no
avail.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Any suggestions?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>John</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Apr 08 09:24:13 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from waltt1.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA06911
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 8 Apr 2000 09:07:09 -0700
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by waltt1.thetrellis.net; Sat, 08 Apr 2000 09:08:43 -0700
Received: from elch.de.uu.net by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.0.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 08 Apr 2000 09:00:17 -0700
Received: from frankfurt.netsurf.de (pec-40-37.tnt4.f.uunet.de [149.225.40.37])
by elch.de.uu.net (5.5.5/5.5.5) with ESMTP id SAA12154;
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 18:02:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <38EF58A1.D9DFDB15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 12:04:49 -0400
From: Daniel Goncharoff <Daniel.Goncharoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RT] Re: Non- Manipulation of Stock Market
References: <20000407201844.11986.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: Daniel.Goncharoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDRcpt-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: Daniel.Goncharoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
This brings up a question that has been bothering me: why would the Microsoft
ruling be negative for the Naz. Many more companies would benefit from a
break-up then would suffer.
Did anyone on this list think, oooooh, I should sell because of the ruling, or
know anyone else who thought that way?
Right now, that 'explanation' smells like media bs...
Regards
DanG
"Dr. John Cappello" wrote:
> I believe your conclusions are correct to a point.What caused the volume and
> volatility swings were negative guru comments and Microsoft anti-trust
> rumors which brought out the weak and the strong hands in the same day.
>
> These are phenominal trading opportunities.Based upon this I am giving
> consideration to fully capitalize an e-mini Nasdaq for 4000 points or
> $80,000.If you are right on any position you will win.If you are wrong you
> can pretty well gut it out to a reversal.Not for the faint hearted.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> John
>
> >From: Ronald McEwan <rmac@xxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: rmac@xxxxxxxx
> >To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: [RT] Re: US Govt. Manipulation of Stock Market
> >Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 15:16:21 -0400
> >
> >I was examining what had happened Tuesday to see what useful information
> >could be obtained. I did a study of the relationship of volatility and
> >volume. I used the NYA index because it reports volume. I used the high
> >low statistical volatility for the volatility measure. I took the 20 day
> >average of both the total NYA volume and the high low statistical
> >volatility measure. Based on my results, I believe that with a continued
> >increase in daily volume on the exchanges, that there will be a
> >subsequent increase in volatility. With the increased volatility you will
> >see 500 and 600 point swings on the INDU and NASDAQ more frequently. The
> >exchanges are doing everything then can to increase volume, so make sure
> >you keep a good supply of aspirin. I think what happened Tuesday was due
> >partly to the huge increase in volume we have been seeing. The greater
> >the volume, the greater the volatility, the greater the intraday swings.
> >We have seen this already in the Internet stocks exhibiting the same
> >behavior.
> >
> >Ron McEwan
> >
> >high low statistical volatility formula:
> >
> >=(0.627*SQRT(365.25)*LN(High/Low))
> ><< volatility_volume.gif >>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|