|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=4>Sorry Andrew,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=4></FONT><FONT size=4>Irrelevant objection. I
never mentioned having subsidiarìies in the US. Further, my hypothesis
based the co. on SARK which has no offices, no CHamber of Commerce, no nothing.
The actual base of the co. would be somewhere completely different. Hard to
imagine how blackmail such as you suggest could be applied to my
example.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Islandly</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Gram.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Messaggio originale-----</B><BR><B>Da:
</B>Andrew Nopper <<A
href="mailto:anopper@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>anopper@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>A:
</B><A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
<<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Data:
</B>04/04/2000 17:09<BR><B>Oggetto: </B>[RT] Re: <A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=2>Not true Gram, unfortunately. A
Caribbean registered subsidiary of the Bank of Nova Scotia, Canada's 2nd
largest bank, was forced to divulge information recently on one of its
corporate customers, despite that country's very stringent secrecy
laws.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">How was it done? Well, a judge in New York
just slapped a HUGE daily fine on a U.S. subsidiary of the Canadian bank,
until the offshore bank complied. Unfair? Absolutely! Effective? For sure!
Needless to say, the Bank of Nova Scotia no longer accepts any U.S.
customers throughout the Caribbean.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Never underestimate the power of the IRS and
the U.S. government.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Canadially :)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Andrew</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
Gram </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 04, 2000 9:56
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [RT] <A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR><BR>What is erroneous is the notion that the IRS (or
anyone else) can stick its<BR>nose, willy nilly, into the running of a
company based in another country,<BR>especially if it is run in line
with that country's laws.<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Apr 05 07:23:19 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from waltt1.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA17241
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 09:00:00 -0700
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by waltt1.thetrellis.net; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 09:00:37 -0700
Received: from proxy4.ba.best.com by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.0.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 08:52:36 -0700
Received: from ABPSYS1 (dynamic57.pm02.san-mateo.best.com [205.149.174.121])
by proxy4.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.out) with SMTP id IAA01748
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 08:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: "JW" <jw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] RE: RE: Re: stop paying income taxes
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 08:54:35 -0700
Message-ID: <LPBBIKLFNLAMNNMLDELPGEHGCBAA.jw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <001901bf9e34$865b94a0$0100a8c0@xxxxxxxx>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Importance: Normal
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: jw@xxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDRcpt-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: jw@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
As Tonto said to the Lone Ranger "What you mean WE,..." <g>
JW
-----Original Message-----
From: John Manasco [mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 5:52 AM
To: jw@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RT] RE: Re: stop paying income taxes
Lets not forget the tax code was written by politicians WE
elected to
office. This whining about taxes always seems to forget that
this is a
government run by the people. That's us! So in effect we
ourselves wrote the
tax code. When we decide to take full responsibility for
what we have done
then and only then can we change it. So far we always seem
to blame our lot
on "the other guy" or some omnipotent power in Washington
that we have no
control over. It just ain't so.
John Manasco
----- Original Message -----
From: JW <jw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 1:31 AM
Subject: [RT] RE: Re: stop paying income taxes
> CB - A vote for sanity. Good post!
>
> BUT. I think that most people don't/won't mind paying
> reasonable taxes based on a reasonable tax code where
> everyone [mostly] pays their fair share (there will always
> be holes and exceptions). The problem with the US tax
code
> as it exists today is that it panders mainly to special
> interests and corporations who have the lobbying power to
> influence what Congress votes on.
>
> As such, it is now one big mess. In fact, a good analogy
of
> the tax code might be similar to a software program. By
the
> time you get to release 10, you have built layer upon
layer
> on top of the original program. Whatever and however
> release 1.0 was built is the constraining factor that
> carries through all future work. Each subsequent
> modification introduces additional constraints and
> limitations. At some point, the only "real" solution is
to
> wipe the slate clean and start over again. Hopefully,
> someday, someway, somehow <g> a way will be found to force
> our politicians to do just that with the existing tax
code.
>
> JW
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of cb
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 9:31 PM
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [RT] Re: stop paying income taxes
>
>
> itradesp@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to hear from anyone who takes the time
to
> look at these 2
> > web sites. I found them to be very interesting and worth
> the time to
> > research further..
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > http://www.paynoincometax.com
> >
> > http://www.zeroincometax.com
>
>
> I'd be happy if my income taxes were lower. Like most I'd
> like to take
> legitimate deductions.
>
> But, I think anyone who is unwilling to pay the taxes,
ought
> to move
> from the US. Or, stay here but make sure you drive on no
> roads, take no
> medicine that even indirectly came from research supported
> by the NIH,
> never listen to the weather, drink only water that's not
> tested by
> government agencies for purity, never read any material
from
> the USDA
> before you farm or trade corn, etc.
>
> Conrad Bowers
>
>
|