|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
This is a joke only,
$XXX to learn Fibonacci Retracements!!! I'm on the wrong boat, I'm
jumping ship.
TradeWell,
Joe Frabosilio
Chuck wrote:
> Good old Bill got run off of the Omega list last year for should we
> say
> his lack of imagination....ask him to tell you about his dead dog
> Bongo, or Mongo or whatever his name was.
>
> >I have what is intended to be a "helpful" hint to any of you who,
> like Bill,
> >want to vend your wares on Realtraders, but avoid doing so because
> you also
> >want to remain part of our happy little list.
> >
> >When you post something to the list which you hope will "lure"
> prospects to
> >your web site, and thence perhaps become paying customers, give us a
> "taste"
> >of what it is you want to sell. You have to give this away for free,
> >because this then becomes a "sample" of the bigger, better, and
> assumedly
> >more expensive product that you want to sell us.
> >
> >In order for your sales pitch to be effective, and sufficiently
> subtle to
> >get past the list police, you will have to tout the effectiveness of
> what it
> >is you are selling, without disparaging any of the other approaches
> which
> >many of us may be using, however clumsily. In each message
> [recently}, Bill
> >has given us a combo of the Doji Sandwich (his technique, which is
> >interesting to some of us) as well as wagging an increasingly
> irritating
> >finger at those of us who position trade. Incidentally Bill, if you
> have
> >such distaste for position trading, my suggestion would be to simply
> not
> >mention it, choosing instead to describe (as you have occasionally
> done in
> >the past) how one or two of your techniques might work better in some
> sample
> >situation.
> >
> >Many contributors on this list come to mind... those most valued are
> those
> >who selflessly (and apparently absent promotion) parcel out
> information on
> >an occasional (sometimes frequent) basis for the advantage of any of
> us
> >willing to consider it. Those are the contributions which are
> interesting
> >enough to make me consider perhaps buying something more. I would
> venture
> >the speculation that very few of these "regular contributors" are
> large
> >scale traders. And if they are, more to their credit for sharing
> some of
> >what they know.
> >
> >Don't worry... we won't rob you of any trade secrets. Who knows...
> you just
> >might persuade some of us that day-trading is really a better way!
> >
> >Dick Crotinger
> >
> >
> >
|