|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Well the bonds closed down, but leaving what might
be thought slightly too much of the pole above ground. However, with the
benefit of the overnight tonight, we may see what might turn out to be a good
down-bar to prove the point. On the other hand we might
not! How you position boys ever get to know what the market is
really going to do, I know not! I really don't!
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>For us day traders, it doesn't matter so
much. It is just helpful to have the longer time frames telling and
confirming what is going on. It give you a chance to look for sell
signals, if the daily set-up is making the market look weak. When we
are in such rarefied atmosphere above Contract Highs, it makes it that much more
difficult to trade, but if we can move down a notch, then a whole bunch of
res/sup lines come into play and give us the clues we need.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Anyway, if the overnight is well down and the open
is likewise, then a punt at the puts might be on for the longer term trader or
else margining yourself in that direction. The day trader will just trade
what is in front of him...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Best of...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bill Eykyn<BR><A
href="http://www.t-bondtrader.com";>www.t-bondtrader.com</A><BR>"Learn to read
the tape"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>PS It is not really worth sending a Gif file,
but that Pole on the Hill might become quite high point as the daily chart
develops over the next few days and weeks.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Mar 23 14:03:34 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from waltt1.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA16235
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:02:56 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by waltt1.thetrellis.net; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:03:09 -0800
Received: from goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.0.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:55:10 -0800
Received: from earthlink.net (sdn-ar-005casfrMP108.dialsprint.net [158.252.212.110])
by goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA13398
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <38DA9366.EA1E6677@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:57:58 -0500
From: Don Thompson <detomps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD47 (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RT] Re: LFG, LLC Capital Requirements=Rumors
References: <862568AB.00510E64.00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: detomps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDRcpt-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: detomps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
I also found out the same thing by calling the CME's audit department
late this afternoon. I was told they are members in good standing.
Apparently alot of rumor's are flying around.
Don Thompson
rchehovin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Good Morning Realtraders:
>
> I would like to address the rumor about LFG, LLC having difficulty meeting it's
> regulatory capital requirement. An unnamed inside source has told me the
> company has no difficulty complying with capital requirements. LFG's ownership
> has been approached by several outside interested parties but no deal has been
> struck as of late yesterday (3/22).
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Richard Chehovin
|