|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=4>Anyone trading Fx. on the list? Be nice to
exchange some charts.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=4></FONT><FONT size=4>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Gram.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Messaggio originale-----</B><BR><B>Da:
</B>wallst <<A
href="mailto:wallst@xxxxxxxx";>wallst@xxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>A: </B><A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
<<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Data:
</B>26/02/2000 18:40<BR><B>Oggetto: </B>[RT] Trading the S&P in todays
markets<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>To All RT's</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Im just curious, Are any of you that are trading the
S&P's finding it more difficult trading the S&P's in todays
markets? From the start of the year I have been finding it a lot more
difficult to make money consistantly on a daily Basis. Im just curious
if its just me or is everyone finding this to be the case...
Thanks</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Troy</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>wallst@xxxxxxxx</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Feb 27 16:30:35 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA31665
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 10:01:38 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 10:02:28 -0800
Received: from defiant.coinet.com by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 09:55:19 -0800
Received: (qmail 2890 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2000 17:58:32 -0000
Received: from tc1-3-8.cns-nw.com (HELO coinet.com) (204.119.54.54)
by coinet.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2000 17:58:32 -0000
Message-ID: <38B81445.41B72A1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 09:58:29 -0800
From: Dennis Holverstott <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] Re: Out On A Limb
References: <20000226165039.23434.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: dennis@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: dennis@xxxxxxxxxx
Status:
> Everyone speaks about the Dow / Nasdaq divergence but the true divergence
> has been the S&P / Dow divergence.
Same divergence. Many of the biggest stocks in the S&P trade on Nasdaq.
So, if the Dow goes down and the NDX goes up, the S&P will be somewhere
in between.
> There was a time when one S&P point equalled 6 to 8 Dow points. That > will return and you will know the situation is normalized.
Not really. They will just change the stocks in the Dow to "normalize"
things. They already added MSFT and INTC to the chagrin of some NYSE
members and they are talking about doing some more of that because the
Dow isn't an "accurate reflection" of the economy.
This tech thing may be a bubble or it may really be a fundamental
change. Art Cashin on CNBC compared it to the railroad stocks in the
1800s. They went from being insignificant to dominating the market and
it lasted for many years.
--
Dennis
|