[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: Bull/Bear Spreads on Futures Options



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Mindspring wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>&nbsp;<font color="#000000"><font size=-1>Hello,</font></font>
<font color="#000000"><font size=-1>I am entertaining the idea of using
Bull/Bear Spreads to trade S&amp;P 500 futures options.&nbsp; It's been
about a decade since I last investigated options spreads (stocks only -
not futures) and have a few questions.&nbsp; I contacted my futures broker
and it was quite obvious he was not totally up to speed on the topic himself.
The conversation went something like this ...</font></font> <font color="#000000"><font size=-1>Me
- I'm thinking about employing Bull/Bear Spread futures options to daytrade
the S&amp;P 500 market.&nbsp; Let's take for instance a hypothetical bull
spread - buying the lower strike price call option and selling the higher
strike call option.&nbsp; What is my margin requirement for such an animal?Broker-
There is no margin requirement, you just pay the net premium for the spread.</font></font>
<br><font color="#FF0000"><font size=-1>This is correct.</font></font>
<br>&nbsp;<font size=-1><font color="#000000">Me - But what if the short
call is in-the-money and is exercised against me?</font>Broker - You don't
have to worry about that.<font color="#FF0000"> You now have a bear spread.
Long the call and short the future.&nbsp; You don't have to worry.&nbsp;
The risk is just the premium between the strike and the option value.&nbsp;
If they exercised the short on the bull spread and it was deep in the money,
the long one was deeper in the money and was probably trading near intrinsic
value.</font>Me - You mean no one ever exercises S&amp;P 500 futures options?Broker
- You don't have to worry about that.Me - But let's say someone did exercise
my short in-the-money call option.&nbsp; I don't understand why I wouldn't
be required to have the funds (margin) to purchase a S&amp;P 500 futures
contract and deliver it to the call buyer.&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">
Futures are created. unlike stock which has to be borrowed.&nbsp; The books
just say you&nbsp; are short and he is long and the option disappears.</font>Broker
- You would be covered by your long call position. etc, etc,</font> <font size=-1>With
each question, my broker placed me on hold and asked my questions to someone
else and then reported their input back to me.&nbsp; Could someone who
is well versed in this area please provide me will real answers to my questions
posed.&nbsp; Thanks, Brian</font>
<p><font color="#FF0000"><font size=-1>Call the exchange and ask them for
the informational brochures and margin requirements.&nbsp; This is all
provided free.&nbsp; When I was trading, 98% of the brokers didn't understand
options.&nbsp; I hope that has improved today, but I doubt it has by very
much.&nbsp; No matter what they call themselves, they are salesmen.&nbsp;
Would you ever ask a sales person to fix anything you purchased or understand
how it really works.&nbsp; Ira.</font></font></blockquote>

<p>Mindspring wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>&nbsp;</blockquote>

</body>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Feb 14 16:50:48 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
	by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA08999
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:32:38 -0700
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
	([208.179.56.198])
	by mail.thetrellis.net; Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:26:34 -0800
Received: from mailhost.ap.net by realtraders.com
	with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:20:01 -0800
Received: from ap.net (D-17.Arch-03.ap.net [207.44.219.210])
	by mailhost.ap.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00979;
	Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:22:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <38A89C67.AE362161@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:23:03 -0800
From: Ira Tunik <ist@xxxxxx>
X-Sender: "Ira Tunik" <ist@xxxxxxxxxxx> (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD (AccessPort)  (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] Re: GEN: Barron's story " King of Naples"
References: <38A8418F.A4580F6E@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: ist@xxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: ist@xxxxxx
Status:   

YOu would need an investment attorney.  Ira.

Joe Frabosilio wrote:

> While coming back from New Orleans over the weekend.  I knew Barron's
> would have a story about the Bermuda-based hedge fund, Manhattan
> Investments.   What I didn't know was that Dr. Van K Tharp was somewhat
> involved with David Mobley.
>
> Page 29
> " Mobley himself has become a fixture at trading seminars put on by
> North Carolina psychologist Van K. Tharp, who has made a career of
> counseling both professional and amateur traders in behavioral
> self-control.  Money really started cascading into Maricopa after June
> 1997, when Tharp touted Mobley's performance record and called him the
> most successful graduate of Tharp's two-year Super Trader Program.
> Mobley's investment record was even touted by Tharp in a Forbes magazine
> profile of the psychologist.  "
>
> "Tharp recently told Barron's in a telephone interview that he thinks so
> highly of Mobley that he has put the bulk of his personal wealth into
> Maricopa.  Tharp's Website, called the International Institute of
> Trading Mastery, describes Mobley as a "fantastic trader and
> businessman"  and a "wonderful human being." "
>
> "Manhattan Investment Fund had defrauded investors out of $300 million
> by phonying up the trade and account information sent to its independent
> auditors to cover up"monumental" trading losses. "
>
> At first I thought Dr. Van K. Tharp was in on the scam and receiving
> kickbacks.  But after thinking out it, I think that Dr. Tharp just got
> caught up in the wrap.
>
> Anyone close to Dr. Van Tharp?  Did he come out with a statement about
> David Mobley?
>
> What could an investor do, if he/she invested in an offshore hedge fund
> and found it to be like Manhattan Investment Fund?  Are there any legal
> grounds?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe Frabosilio