[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] RE: RE: Re: FUTR: Head games.


  • To:
  • Subject: [RT] RE: RE: Re: FUTR: Head games.
  • From: "Paul Weston"
  • Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 12:12:07 -0500
  • Cc: "'REAL TRADERS'" , "Richard Chehovin (E-mail)"
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to:
  • Reply-to:
  • Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Life is a gamble and if you don't believe so, you are in for a rude
awakening.

Every time you go to the store, you are gambling that you will make it back
alive.

The only thing we can do in life is to try to stack the odds in our favor.
That's what professional gamblers do.  The more successful ones are better
at it.

Webster's defines gambling as "to take a risk in order to gain some
advantange".

If somehow you have managed to eliminate all risk in trading, that is great.
Otherwise, your are gambling.

Let's have a poll.  Who on this list is not a gambler (i.e. a risk taker)?

Regards,
Paul

-----Original Message-----
From:	ist@xxxxxx [mailto:ist@xxxxxx]
Sent:	Monday, February 07, 2000 11:56 AM
To:	paulweston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [RT] RE: Re: FUTR: Head games.


I feel sorry for you if you are gambling.  Trading is a business and if
treated
as such can be very profitable.  If you are gambling or feel that you are,
then
like most gamblers, you will end up a loser.  Being profitable in the
interim,
doesn't mean that the ultimate fate will not befall you.  the professional
"gambler" doesn't  feel that he is gambling.  It is his business and he
treats
it as such.  He knows the odds, probabilities and the other facts of the
game he
is playing.  The professional in any endeavor doesn't believe that he is
gambling. From what I have heard the biggest gambles are the restaurant or
contracting businesses. Good luck and put a buck on the beans for me.  Ira.

Paul Weston wrote:

> I went thru some of this myself and basically I focus on 2 things:
>
> 1) I perform a service.  If it were not for speculators such as myself,
the
> markets would lose liquidity and would not work nearly as well.
>
> 2) Nobody comes into this game without the knowledge they are a gambler,
and
> part of gambling is to risk losing money.  In fact, my job is to take your
> money.  Plan and simple.
>
> If you don't feel good about the realities of trading, I would suggest
> looking at another profession.  There are plenty to choose from.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:   listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of comdytrd
> Sent:   Sunday, February 06, 2000 6:55 PM
> To:     realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:        [RT] Re: FUTR: Head games.
>
> Howdy,
>
> I've been working on my head lately...  Trying to figure out why I even
care
> whose money I take on those successful occasions.  (They never seem to
feel
> guilty when they take mine do they?)  So why do I feel hesitance and guilt
> and how shall I overcome same?  Keep it simple please.
>
> Also I seem to trade best after a loss that makes me mad.   If not, I'm
much
> less focused and slower to act..  It's when I must recover a loss that I'm
> at my best...Is there a technique short of drugs to achieve the focus/
> intensity that being mad seems to produce?
>
> I have begun to counter my perfectionism by remembering to "take the meat
> out" of a trade and leave the crumbs to others... this seems to prevent
> those frequent gut wrenching/market reversal events.
>
> Much obliged for any input.
>
> Michael