[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: MKT: FYI - James Smith/Martin Armstrong (the accused thief)



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Does anyone know if funding US debt from the short end preceded previous
rate inversions and subsequent recessions?

Michael

"Those who would trade opportunity for security will soon have neither."
------- Ben Franklin



----- Original Message -----
From: "JW" <JW@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 02:56
Subject: [RT] MKT: FYI - James Smith/Martin Armstrong (the accused thief)


| Over 4 yrs ago Martin Armstrong warned that the Clinton Administration was
| making a huge mistake in funding the debt mostly on the short-end.
| Armstrong warned that doing so would cause the yield curve to invert and
| that the end result would be greater volatility in the financial markets
and
| a huge vulnerability to the next surge in inflation.  Guess what?...
| Armstrong was right!  As we start a new commodity bull market  we are
about
| to learn why most people don't finance their house on a credit card.
| Effectively the govt is doing just that.  Over 30% of our debt is funded 1
| yr or less; and over 60-70% of our debt is funded 5yrs or less. A more
| prudent administration would have taken advantage of lower longterm rates
to
| lock in most of its financing in 10s & 30s.  But not Slick Willy!  He
knows
| he won't be President when the proverbial fit hits the shan!  So who
cares!
| If the Clinton Administration have decided to issue fewer bonds and buy
back
| off-the-run old bonds, they do so for a reason.
|
| They are trying to negate the effects of a FED rate hike,  but they won't
| succeed.  They will only force Greenspan to raise rates more aggressively
| than he otherwise would, to have requisite slowing effect on the economy.
| You can forget about the Surplus!!!
|
| The Clinton administration just wasted it!!!
|
| A steeply inverted yield curve means that the surplus will disappear
faster
| than most economists are willing to admit.  By the time the Administration
| realizes their mistake, its too late.  It will be difficult to slow down
the
| economy without taking drastic action.  In the meantime, commodities will
go
| on a tear, bring inflation that this administration would like to deny or
| ignore.
|
| The CRB just closed the month of January above 206.73, electing a key
| monthly bullish reversal.  The next higher monthly bullish reversals are
now
| at 231.74, 235.36, and  246.85.  The gap between 206.73 and 231.74 is huge
| and may suggest a fast move to fill the gap.
|
| Granted a monthly signal on the Reversal System does not imply much about
| the short-term.  It could take a few months or more for  the CRB to reach
| 231.74.  In fact, we cannot rule out some limited weakness in the CRB over
| the short-term.   Just look at Gold.
|
| GOLD is showing absolutely no strength even though OIL and many other
| commodites have started a secular bull market.   In fact the best thing
that
| could happen would be for GOLD  to sell off into its 8 year cycle this
| March.   New Lows below 252 NY Spot into March or as far out as
| May, would strongly suggest that a secular low is in place.  A rally into
| March--May timeframe would suggest a further decline for gold going
forward.
| A weekly close below 277.1 Gold NY Spot will accelerate the current
selloff
| in gold.
|
| Not all commodities have started a new bull market, and gold is a good
| example.  But take a look at a range of commodity charts and you will see
| the future a whole lot more clearly than politicians in Washington DC.
|
| ------
| JW
|
|
|