|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><html>
<font size=3>Mr. Brown,<br>
<br>
By indicating that you had an alias, as seen from your below
statement:<br>
<br>
</font><font size=3 color="#0000FF"><div align="center">
you just think i'm off this one asshole. i have other email address on
<br>
rt stupid shit.<br>
now why dont you be a real moderator pussy.<br>
<br>
</font><font size=3></div>
As you can see, you clearly state and indicate, that you intend to use
your alias. Well, correct me if I am mistaken but if you use that
alias, then you have in fact have posted to a private Forum from which
you were removed, thus the disruption. However, if you intend to
only view the messages as opposed to posting, then yes I am in error and
apologize but I don't believe those were your intentions, please forgive
me if I am wrong.<br>
<br>
I guess we will see.<br>
<br>
Have a good day,<br>
John Boggio - RT Moderator<br>
PS Current RT'ers, again I apologize for the disruption but I concluded
that if you know the facts, this situation could be resolved even
faster. For those who have any comments, please send them to my
personal address<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>The moderator recently posted that
I have an aliases on RT (which is<br>
true) as I maintain on all list I am on. The statement
that he made<br>
about me disrupting the list using this aliases is false completely.
I<br>
did not threaten this and he is
welcomed to produce any evidence<br>
otherwise. I have demanded that he retract that false accusation
that<br>
he made.<br>
</font></blockquote><br>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Jan 21 10:16:22 2000
Return-Path: <realtraders-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.blackboxsystems.com ([204.96.20.131])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA32508
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:17:20 -0800
Received: from [192.168.1.1] by mail.blackboxsystems.com
(Post.Office MTA v3.5.2 release 221 ID# 0-57451U100L100S0V35)
with SMTP id com; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:11:14 -0600
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:11:14 -0600
From: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: http://www.markbrown.com
Message-ID: <15507.000121@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "G.John Boggio" <boggio@xxxxxxxxx>,
scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hyrum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RT_Fwd: Re: Real Traders List
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------60D1171D1EB027"
Status:
This is a forwarded message
From: G.John Boggio <boggio@xxxxxxxxx>
TO: Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, January 21, 2000, 11:55:33 AM
Subject: Real Traders List
***********Original Message Text************
Mr. Brown,
By indicating that you had an alias, as seen from your below statement:
you just think i'm off this one asshole. i have other email address on
rt stupid shit.
now why dont you be a real moderator pussy.
As you can see, you clearly state and indicate, that you intend to use your
alias. Well, correct me if I am mistaken but if you use that alias, then
you have in fact have posted to a private Forum from which you were
removed, thus the disruption. However, if you intend to only view the
messages as opposed to posting, then yes I am in error and apologize but I
don't believe those were your intentions, please forgive me if I am wrong.
I guess we will see.
Have a good day,
John Boggio - RT Moderator
PS Current RT'ers, again I apologize for the disruption but I concluded
that if you know the facts, this situation could be resolved even
faster. For those who have any comments, please send them to my personal
address
>The moderator recently posted that I have an aliases on RT (which is
>true) as I maintain on all list I am on. The statement that he made
>about me disrupting the list using this aliases is false completely. I
>did not threaten this and he is welcomed to produce any evidence
>otherwise. I have demanded that he retract that false accusation that
>he made.
***********End of Original Text***********
WHAT REALLY PISSES ME OFF IS THAT HE pulled selective parts of my post
where he failed to show his post which let me up to that climax.
the moderator for RT suddenly has BALLS!
g. john i'm still mot happy with your apology!
Attachment Converted: "f:\eudora\attach\part21.htm"
|