|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#c0c0c0>
<DIV><FONT face=System size=4><STRONG>HI RT, </STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT
face=System><STRONG>
does anyone know if omega is having a problem with their refresh
data??</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT
face=System><STRONG>
I haven't seen a year 2k yet.</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=System><STRONG>
thanks in advance , Ted</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jan 08 10:19:04 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id AAA31980
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 00:15:36 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 23:08:49 -0800
Received: from hotmail.com by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 23:04:15 +0000
Received: (qmail 8892 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jan 2000 07:06:17 -0000
Message-ID: <20000108070617.8891.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from 63.14.172.235 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 23:06:17 PST
X-Originating-IP: [63.14.172.235]
From: "Darrin Vernier" <gphx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] Re: GEN: Metastock 6.5
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 23:06:17 PST
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: gphx@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: gphx@xxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Brent,
Just had to point out that the .gif is not at all representative of the
quality of the original bitmap which is too large to attach.
The bitmap is several orders higher in quality, which you will see for
yourself if you give it a try. Hyper Snap just doesn't seem to do justice to
a bitmap...
Darrin
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|