|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Don,
Many thanks for the reply.
That any 2 lengths would have nearly a 2 to 1 relationship seems to me a
weak proof. I'm really lost in regards to music applying to the markets
aside from the fact that you will find echos of humanity in anything created
by men. If .812 were .618, .786, or even .875 I'd know something about the
significance of that number. I don't know enough about symetry wave to
comment.
However, if we throw out the time numbers and plug the first 2 vectors into
the Pythagorean Theorem the third number works out to be equal to 104.57 and
that number subtracted from point number 3 (the high on 1//3/2000) is
approx.. 1392 and the low on 1/5/2000 was 1387. Only 5 dollars off, if that
is the target. At any rate maybe I will learn something new like how to cube
the market. It's not exactly like cubing a steak.
Brent
> Brent,
> In the three examples, there were three vectors.
>
> 66.635
> 135.271
> 110.39
>
> If I divide 135.271 by 66.635 the result is 2.030 rounded off that is 2.
> 2 is twice as big as 1. I am not a musician but I think that is the same
> as a doubling of a frequency or one octive up.
>
> If I want to figure out the target. I have to use the A2 + B2 = C2.
> I would start with a low or a high and jigger the hours and the price to
> get a vector that comes out to 66.635 or a double or a triple or a
> quadruple.
>
> What I was trying to say was that there is a price time relationship one
> one area of the chart and a little while later the same relationship
> turned up. It like Boggio's symetry wave stuff.
> Same thing, just a little more precise.
>
> I am way over my head as far as explaining the .816 number. The only
> way to get it is to look at it yourself with a calculator and figure it
> out. Simply, the hypotenuse of a triangle is a diagonal in a
> rectangular form, square or golden rectangle, and then the cube also has
> a diagonal. The example just happened to land on that number.
>
> Also, I wasn't trying to forecast anything, I was showing that the
> price-time vector idea does have validity in the market..
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Don
> Brent wrote:
> >
> > Hi Don,
> >
> > I appreciate your help but I am still not clear on what you are doing.
> >
> > I have atached a chart of March SP showing what I think you are talking
> > about. I don't understand the numbers 2.030... and .816 also where is
that
> > target and what was it.
> >
> > Brent
> >
> > > I am reading about how to do it..
> > >
> > > Time is in trading hours.
> > > Price is Price in dollars.
> > >
> > > The theory is that the hypotenuse is called a vector.
> > > I haven't done the hunderd hours of research but, What I read was that
> > > there exists a
> > > vector that expesses itself over time.
> > > This vector expands or contacts according to a musical scale and to
> > > basic geometrical forms
> > > like the square, golden rectangle and cube.
> > >
> > > Example:
> > >
> > > The 1470 11:30 high on 12/3/99
> > > The 1410.5 low at 13:30 pm 12/9/99
> > > Price delta = 59.5
> > > Hours delta = 30
> > > Vector = 66.635
> > > ========
> > >
> > > The 1410.5 low at 13:30 pm 12/9/99
> > > The 1496.5 high at 9:30 am 1/3/00
> > > Price delta = 86.5
> > > time delta =104 hours
> > >
> > > Vector = 135.271..
> > >
> > > I divide 135.271 by 66.636 and get 2.030...
> > > Hmmm pretty doggone close.. So there is a PTV vector at work in the
> > > futures of 66.635.
> > > =======
> > > Take the high at 1496 .50 to the 1387 low which took 14 hours.
> > > That vector is 110.39..
> > > If I divide it by 135.271 I get .816.. funny number..
> > > but it is the ratio of the Diagonal of the Cube divided by the
diagonal
> > > of a square...
> > >
> > > I will let you figure that one out.. I am stumped..Maybe Number Genius
> > > Mark Brown will elucidate.
> > >
> > > Don
> > >
> >
> > [Image]
>
>
>
|