|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#C0C0C0">
<P>ted stampeen wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE><STYLE></STYLE>
<B><FONT FACE="System"><FONT SIZE=+1>TO
ALL,</FONT></FONT></B><B><FONT FACE="System">
I will quote a famous old philosopher,</FONT></B> <B><FONT FACE="System">
" I TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH WHAT YOU SAY,</FONT></B><B><FONT FACE="System">
BUT WILL DEFEND TO MY DEATH YOUR RIGHT TO SAY IT."</FONT></B> <B><FONT FACE="System">
GOODWILL AND FREE SPEECH TO ALL,</FONT></B> <B><FONT FACE="System">
TED,</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT FACE="System"> Good quote and I agree. But,
let's not forget to give credit to the originator.</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT FACE="System">I think your quote came from Voltaire.</FONT></B><B><FONT FACE="System"></FONT></B>
<P><B><FONT FACE="System">Happy New Year,</FONT></B><B><FONT FACE="System"></FONT></B>
<P><B><FONT FACE="System">Norman</FONT></B></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Dec 30 22:38:23 1999
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id UAA29418
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 20:29:07 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 19:22:16 -0800
Received: from crusoe.crusoe.net by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 19:18:23 +0000
Received: from pgms ([206.136.71.216]) by crusoe.crusoe.net
(Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-52487U2500L250S0V35)
with SMTP id net; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:19:51 -0500
Message-ID: <012001bf533d$f0586aa0$d84788ce@xxxx>
Reply-To: "swp" <swp@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "swp" <swp@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3.0.6.32.19991230210507.00797b90@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] Re: QCOM
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:20:06 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: swp@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
The guy who wrote the report is 28-years old (irrelevant) and it is the
first report he EVER wrote. And the market took the darned thing up
1/3rd on a nobody. One thing though going in its favor, its P/E is no
where near as high as Cisco's. Also, they will no longer be making their
phones. They sold that to Kyocera so their margins should improve. Just
selling the chips and collecting royalties (and all this from a
technical analyst).
---
Steven W. Poser, President
Poser Global Market Strategies Inc.
url: http://www.poserglobal.com
email: swp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tel: 201-995-0845
Fax: 201-995-0846
----- Original Message -----
From: wong <whs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 9:05 PM
Subject: [RT] Re: QCOM
> Dear Ira and John:
>
> Some analyst set the price target of Qcom to be $1,000 within a year.
> Maybe it's too early to short the stock?
>
> A broker friend of mine once told me (20 years ago) that trading is
like a
> bull stampede. You don't want to stand in front of the bulls when
they're
> charging towards you (that is, fighting against the current trend).
Best
> thing is to step aside, wait for some technical indicators to validate
what
> you're going to do (but also notice that in a very bullish
environment, the
> indicators can be extremely overbought and still remain that way for
months
> to come..).
>
> To minimize the loss, perhaps one should also look at some puts?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Wong
> =================================================================
> At 06:50 PM 12/30/1999 EST, Dr. John Cappello wrote:
> >Dear Ira,
> >
> >You are absolutely right.After your post I decided to check into a
Vertical
> >Call Spread and I will see what the numbers look like tomorrow.
>
>
>
>
|