|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<u>You say the good Doc have broken the ground rules for this group. Please
specify which rules you feel he has broken.</u>
<p><u>Larry Wright wrote:</u>
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><u>On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Gary Kramer wrote:</u>
<p><u>> the Dr. has done nothing wrong.</u>
<p><u>Well... yes and no. It does appear that his posts are not in keeping
with</u>
<br><u>the ground rules for the list. I would have to agree with Mark on
this.</u>
<p><u>I would also have to observe that the good Doc's posts have caused
the</u>
<br><u>largest disruption in quite a while.</u></blockquote>
I WOULD SAY MARK BROWN HAS CAUSED MORE DISRUPTION THAN JOHN
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> </blockquote>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Dec 30 14:59:34 1999
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA16174
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 12:45:30 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:37:50 -0800
Received: from fep02-svc.tin.it by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:33:45 +0000
Received: from study ([212.216.33.32]) by fep02-svc.tin.it
(InterMail v4.01.01.02 201-229-111-106) with SMTP
id <19991230193524.HTRJ980.fep02-svc@xxxxx>
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Thu, 30 Dec 1999 20:35:24 +0100
Message-ID: <00d701bf52fd$905a3e20$2021d8d4@xxxxx>
From: "Gram" <gramario@xxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] R: Re: Helping the good Doc...
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 20:39:17 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D3_01BF5305.F1553BA0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: gramario@xxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: gramario@xxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><STRONG>Does it matter? Can we not rise above
this frivolity and get back to some trading
discussions?</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2><STRONG></STRONG><STRONG>Please.</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><STRONG></STRONG></FONT><FONT face=Arial
size=2><STRONG>Best,</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2><STRONG></STRONG><STRONG>Gram.</STRONG><BR><BR></DIV></FONT><U>You
say the good Doc have broken the ground rules for this group. Please specify
which rules you feel he has broken.</U>
<P><U>Larry Wright wrote:</U>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE = CITE><U>On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Gary Kramer wrote:</U>
<P><U>> the Dr. has done nothing wrong.</U>
<P><U>Well... yes and no. It does appear that his posts are not in
keeping with</U> <BR><U>the ground rules for the list. I would have to
agree with Mark on this.</U>
<P><U>I would also have to observe that the good Doc's posts have caused
the</U> <BR><U>largest disruption in quite a while.</U></P></BLOCKQUOTE>I
WOULD SAY MARK BROWN HAS CAUSED MORE DISRUPTION THAN JOHN
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE = CITE> </BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Dec 30 14:59:36 1999
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA16510
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 12:53:55 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:46:41 -0800
Received: from zianet.com by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:42:36 +0000
Received: (qmail 9335 invoked by alias); 30 Dec 1999 19:44:39 -0000
Delivered-To: alias-outgoing-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@outgoing
Received: (qmail 9024 invoked from network); 30 Dec 1999 19:44:38 -0000
Received: from ruidoso0110.zianet.com (HELO p13301) (216.234.206.110)
by zianet.com with SMTP; 30 Dec 1999 19:44:38 -0000
Message-ID: <022701bf52fe$3dbb7750$6eceead8@xxxxxx>
From: "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] Significant trends for 2000
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 12:43:58 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Thin markets and holiday interruptions at this time of year provide a
opportunity to kick back and consider what longer term trends may affect
trading and investing for the coming year. I thought it might prove
rewarding and interesting to start a thread to collect the best thinking
on the forum. I'm not referring to forecasts which are nothing more than
a guessing exercise, but to perceived trends which a) are established
and appear to have long term staying power and b) nascent trends which
may bring significant changes in trends in the year ahead.
I started building my list a couple of weeks ago, and it's not complete,
but here's what I have so far in no particular order of importance:
1) Broad gains in US productivity driven by transformation of
information systems, especially during past 2 years of Y2K preparation
2) Increased corporate pricing power driven by consolidation and
increasing demand
3) Corporate reorganization in Europe and Asia driven by competition
from US corporations
3) Higher prices for extracted commodities driven by stronger economies
and consolidation
4) Increased adversarial military and terrorist alliances driven by US
military hegemony
5) Correction in prices of US financial assets driven by extreme
valuations and higher interest rates
Earl
|