[RT] Re: [realtraders] S&P and Nasdaq S/R for 12/28/99

[nwinski <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

ROBERT ROESKE wrote:

> I am afraid I have to echo Mark's comments too.  RT's purpose is not a mail
> forwarding or broadcasting service, but to share trading techniques,
> methodologies, etc.  The pivot technique has been overdone imho.  A few
> years back we had a few other people who repeatedly posted fibonacci time
> and price targets that were eventually asked to cool it.  Such information
> is better sent directly to those who request it rather than 2,000, ney 3000
> people who are not interested and would never trade with it without
> understanding the calculations and being able to do them themselves.
>
> BR,

       I don't echo Mr. Brown's comments. I think that questioning the merit of
any post is valid.
However, I don't think that there is any room on this list for rudeness or
malicious sarcasm.  If you want to kick your spouse or beat your dog, that's
your business. But, when you post on this list,
you effect the psychological outlook of fellow traders. This means you should
conduct yourself
with courtesy, kindness,  and only convey positive energy. Some of us make our
living from trading and we don't need to take in other people's mental
garbage.  The world would be a much knder and gentler place if everyone just
used good manners.  Please treat others the way you would want to be treated.

Thanks,

Norman





>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: RealTradersList <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, December 27, 1999 3:43 PM
> Subject: [RT] Re: [realtraders] S&P and Nasdaq S/R for 12/28/99
>
> > Hello  Dr.,
> >
> > Monday, December 27, 1999, 12:26:59 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > >>>The S&P closed at 1477.8 vs. 3640 for the Nasdaq.Numbers for
> > >>>both appear acceptable given volatility.
> > >>>By request:
> >
> > Who the heck is requesting these numbers (that is who hasn't a hotmail
> > account or some other untraceable web address)?
> >
> > I  honestly  would  love to understand why you persist at keeping this
> > method  proprietary.  It  serves  absolutely no one to the betterment of
> > their trading except maybe as food for some mindless sheep.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >   Mark Brown                        mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >