|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dear Mark,
I hope you feel better real soon.I have seen a lot more mindless stuff
posted here including some of yours to which you never reply privately.As to
any supporters you have,I do believe I make many contributions to this
list...and yes there are people who use this and compare notes without me or
them asking for how they were developed...it is called prerogative.
I personally do not have a lot of interest in many trading technicqes I see
posted but should I "burn the books" on their right to post.No, I do not
follow or comment on them because they may have a place that I missed.But I
know you miss nothing because you know it all.Why you even bother with the
likes of me and some others on realtraders is beyond me.Perhaps I should
feel honored.
Get well and love,
John
>From: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>CC: RealTradersList <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [RT] Re: [realtraders] S&P and Nasdaq S/R for 12/28/99
>Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 17:43:07 -0600
>
>Hello Dr.,
>
>Monday, December 27, 1999, 12:26:59 PM, you wrote:
>
>
> >>>The S&P closed at 1477.8 vs. 3640 for the Nasdaq.Numbers for
> >>>both appear acceptable given volatility.
> >>>By request:
>
>Who the heck is requesting these numbers (that is who hasn't a hotmail
>account or some other untraceable web address)?
>
>I honestly would love to understand why you persist at keeping this
>method proprietary. It serves absolutely no one to the betterment of
>their trading except maybe as food for some mindless sheep.
>
>--
>Best regards,
> Mark Brown mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|