|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
No, I make the assumption that if these methods are viable, then at least
10% of the tens of thousands of people who have studied under them would
have become successful traders. I then assume that out of that group at
least 10% would find money management an attractive option. There may be
some, so I questioned the group to see if they new of any. I do not need a
pious lecture on what success is. I think it is different for everyone.
Money management is a high paying field that can afford one quite a bit of
freedom. It is ridiculous to think that none of these thousands of Gann or
Gilmore style traders would choose it as a profession.
I make such a negative sounding post in order to suggest the possibility
that these methods are bogus. Since I can not prove a negative, I invite
someone to provide some evidence that they do work.
sb
----- Original Message -----
From: Ira Tunik <ist@xxxxxx>
To: <scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Where are.... {01}
> You make one assumption that is incorrect. If someone is a successful
trader,
> using Gann or any other system, he will want to be a high powered fund
manager
> with a gazillion dollars under control. There are many successful traders
that
> just want to be left alone, do their thing and be happy.
>
> A sign of success is not being a fund manager, or a CTA managing millions.
> Success is being able to do anything you want any time you want to do it.
> Everything that is legal of course. Ira
>
> Scot Billington wrote:
>
|