|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Norman,
Seemed he knew quite abit of the technical language of astrology,
If you look at the contents of his program, it has an ephemeris tool to
do research,
Apparently, Gilmore adapted the use of solar degrees in time counts and
the use of Ptolomy aspects in some of his thinking.
When you do your trading do you use astro to the exclusion of time price
squaring?
Squaringly,
Don
nwinski wrote:
>
> Don Thompson wrote:
>
> > Norman,
> >
> > I recently heard the same thing from Bryce Gilmore, It was his
> > contention that Gann had the price time theory mapped out and making
> > money before he connected it to Astrology. Gilmore's testing is that
> > any CIT of major import is nailed by precise geometrical relationships,
> > usually 3 to 4 or so. He has found that Astrology leaves alot on the
> > table as far as promise when compared to the examination of time-price
> > geometry..
> >
> > Squaringly,
> >
> > Don,
>
> I wasn't aware that Bryce Gilmore knew enough Astrology to give it a fair trial?
>
> Cosmically,
>
> Norman
>
> >
> >
> > nwinski wrote:
> > >
> > > Adam Hefner wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am not a Gann expert, but it is my understanding that Gann developed his
> > > > geometry methods early in his career, and didn't use astrology until his
> > > > later years......so I question the "First and foremost".
> > > >
> > > > Adam Hefner,
> > >
> > > My source of information is someone who was Gann's partner for 10 years and
> > > his father worked with Gann before he did. Both son and father were Astrologers.
> > > What is your source of information?
> > > Anyone read "Tunnel Thru The Air"? It is a gold mine of hidden Astrological
> > > patterns. It tells what Astrological patterns Gann used to trade the markets.
> > > But, you have to know enough Astrology to be able to check out Gann's dates in
> > > an ephemeris. This book has been fully decoded by Bonnie Hill on video via a
> > > lecture she gave about 3 years ago.
> > >
> > > Cosmically,
> > >
> > > Norman
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "nwinski" <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 6:03 PM
> > > > Subject: [RT] Re: Gen: Keep it quiet. {02}
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Brent wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have been reading one of Gann's books I'm astounded by just the few
> > > > things
> > > > > > that I've read in the first 50 pages. I have been writing indicators to
> > > > test
> > > > > > these things and I can't hardly believe my eyes. No one must actually
> > > > read
> > > > > > this stuff. I never hear anyone talk about it. I'm seriously thinking of
> > > > > > throwing all my old analysis away. I didn't think much about Gann until
> > > > I
> > > > > > figured out how to put Gann angles on charts. After that I could see
> > > > that
> > > > > > there might be something to it. I'm just dumbfounded.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brent,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just wait until you add Astrology to your analysis. First and
> > > > foremost,
> > > > > Gann was an Astrology.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Wishes,
> > > > >
> > > > > Norman
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
|